Ed Driscoll

By Ed Driscoll

Bio

Get Updates From Ed Driscoll

At the Daily Caller, Mike Riggs writes:

It seems that John Edwards’ mistress Rielle Hunter had no idea that her photoshoot with GQ would make her look straight-up crazy. On “The View” today, Barbara Walters discussed a phone call with Hunter in which she asked the videographer about the GQ photoshoot:

“She was in tears when she called and said that when she saw the pictures in GQ, she screamed for two hours.” Rielle, who had previously met with Barbara last June in preparation for an interview that never transpired, told Barbara “she found the photographs repulsive.  When I asked if that was the case, why did she pose the way she did, she said she trusted Mark Seliger, whom she said is a brilliant photographer, and quote, ‘I went with the flow.’”

I’m not sure which is more naive of Hunter: trusting John Edwards to be honest, or trusting a legacy media photographer to make his or her subject look good when there’s a narrative that needs to be illustrated.

(Besides, while Hunter apparently believes in all sorts of New Age mysticism, it’s not like the MSM considers her a deity, of course.)

Meanwhile, some related thoughts from Ann Althouse: “The New Republic illustrates a serious piece about the Tea Party movement with a gross photograph that’s meant to evoke the pejorative ‘teabagger.’” Moe Lane adds, “TNR should just Embrace the Hate, already.”

I think they already have.

Update: Found via Sister Toldjah, Jeff Taylor writes:

Voters of North Carolina need to look at themselves in the mirror and ask how it is that they completely fell for a man — electing him a United States senator — so flawed as John Edwards, a man who would so completely fall for a shambles like Rielle Hunter.

And that goes double for the boys and girls at McClatchy who allowed themselves to get swept up in John Edwards fever simply because he punched all their liberal do-gooder buttons.

Not that the man who ultimately punched all their liberal do-gooder buttons has been much of an improvement, of course.

Update: “Hello America, My Name Is Reille Hunter:”


PJ Media appreciates your comments that abide by the following guidelines:

1. Avoid profanities or foul language unless it is contained in a necessary quote or is relevant to the comment.

2. Stay on topic.

3. Disagree, but avoid ad hominem attacks.

4. Threats are treated seriously and reported to law enforcement.

5. Spam and advertising are not permitted in the comments area.

These guidelines are very general and cannot cover every possible situation. Please don't assume that PJ Media management agrees with or otherwise endorses any particular comment. We reserve the right to filter or delete comments or to deny posting privileges entirely at our discretion. Please note that comments are reviewed by the editorial staff and may not be posted immediately. If you feel your comment was filtered inappropriately, please email us at story@pjmedia.com.

1 Comments, 1 Threads

  1. –> Tiger Woods, Barack Obama, and Image

    Quip:
    Mary:  Oh no! They see us and know who you are.
    John:  Don’t worry. It’s only some reporters, and my guys will handle them.

    12/08/09 – American Thinker by Lisa Schiffren
      [edited] Schiffren: “We liked Tiger personally for an image that we now see is a fraud. We liked his low-key demeanor, manners, sweet smile, magazine covers, political analogies, and product endorsements. We feel betrayed.

    Even more, we see how much sustained, deliberate deception goes into the construction of a public image, when there is profit to be made or power to be had.”

    AMG: Surprise is discovering the real Tiger Woods. Shock is understanding that we were fooled by techniques used by both athletes and politicians.