The WNBA has finally discovered a boundary.
After years of progressive politics, inclusion campaigns, and lectures about gender, two former NBA players walked up to the league's front door and asked a wonderfully inconvenient question: If gender identity determines who belongs in women's spaces, why can't we play?
Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White announced plans to enter the 2027 WNBA draft after identifying themselves as transgender women. League sources quickly declared both men ineligible.
From U.S. News & World Report:
The sources described the move as an effort to sow division within the WNBA and court attention, amid a nationwide firestorm over U.S. President Donald Trump's repeated efforts to ban transgender women from women's sports.
There are no active, openly transgender players in the WNBA, which does not currently have a specific, publicly available policy on transgender participation. The league is in ongoing conversations with stakeholders on the issue.
Comments made by Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham in an ESPN interview last month lit the fuse for controversy, with the former second-round pick telling the broadcaster: "I want to protect young girls in a locker room, or young girls in sport who shouldn't have to go against biological men."
The remarks prompted outcry from some longstanding fans of the league, who skew more politically liberal, while others rallied to Cunningham's side, with demonstrations in her support popping up outside Fever games.
The players' union, the WNBPA, released a statement this month declaring they would not be used as "political pawns".
"Hate, abuse, and demonization of any person or group of people, including transgender people, only fuel fear, division, and harm," they said.
No detailed public explanation followed.
Welcome to NIMBY, WNBA edition.
Not In My Basketball Yard.
The league's collective bargaining agreement says, with beautiful simplicity, "Only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA."
From the league's CBA:
PLAYER ELIGIBILITY AND WNBA DRAFT Section 1. Player Eligibility. (a) Only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA. (b) A player is eligible to be selected in the WNBA Draft if she: (i) will be at least twenty-two (22) years old during the calendar year in which such Draft is held and she either has no remaining intercollegiate eligibility or renounces her remaining intercollegiate eligibility by written notice to the WNBA at least ten (10) days prior to such Draft; (ii) has graduated from a four-year college or university prior to such Draft, or “is to graduate” from such college or university within the three (3)-month period following such Draft and she either has no remaining intercollegiate eligibility or renounces her remaining intercollegiate eligibility by written notice to the WNBA at least ten (10) days prior to such Draft
Yet the agreement doesn't publicly define "woman" or spell out an eligibility standard for transgender athletes.
Suddenly, however, everyone seems to know Freedom and White don't qualify.
Why?
Because they don't.
Well, thanks. Glad we cleared that up.
Only weeks ago, Indiana Fever guard Sophie Cunningham said transgender women shouldn't compete in women's sports. Her position brought protests, boos, demonstrations, and plenty of outrage.
The WNBA then complained about "bad-faith" attempts to create controversy around transgender eligibility and insisted there were no immediate eligibility issues.
From the Washington Post:
“There are no immediate eligibility matters affecting the WNBA, and we strongly denounce the bad-faith efforts to use these topics to demean or marginalize others,” a league spokesperson said Wednesday in a statement, hours after an anti-hate task force met virtually and discussed a variety of topics, including social media vitriol and transgender athletes.
The league’s collective bargaining agreement states that “only players who are women are eligible to play in the WNBA,” but it does not include any more specific language about gender identity or sex assigned at birth. Last Friday, two former NBA players, Enes Kanter Freedom and Royce White, declared themselves eligible for the WNBA draft, saying they identify as women.
The draft isn’t until next April.
There has never been a transgender woman — a person assigned male at birth who transitions to align with their gender identity — on a WNBA roster. There have been players in the league who were assigned female at birth and later came out as transgender or nonbinary.
The anti-hate committee was formed last year to deal with hateful and abusive online comments directed at players and the league.
“Today’s meeting covered a wide range of topics, including ongoing discussions on transgender athletes and the continued hate and vitriol directed at players online,” the WNBA statement said. “We will continue to engage all league stakeholders in the coming weeks and months. We will approach these important conversations thoughtfully and in alignment with the values of our league.”
Freedom and White promptly created one.
Now the league has an eligibility issue sitting directly under the basket, waving both arms.
Freedom pushed the argument further Sunday when he attended the Chicago Sky-Indiana Fever game wearing a shirt defending a woman as an "adult human female."
From People:
During the third quarter of Sunday’s game in Chicago, Kanter Freedom, 34, was seen yelling at the Sky guard after she began interacting with him.
As Cloud, 34, pointed at Kanter Freedom and advanced toward him along the baseline, she had to be restrained by teammates.
Wearing a shirt that read, “WOMAN noun adult human female,” the former NBA journeyman was escorted by security away from his courtside seat. On his way out of Wintrust Arena, Kanter Freedom engaged with a booing crowd and mocked Cloud with a “talking hands” gesture.
“I’m supporting women, and that is the reason they’re kicking me out,” Kanter Freedom told a group of arena officials and law enforcement officers in the Wintrust Arena lobby, according to The Athletic. “It’s unacceptable.”
Earlier this month, the self-described “human rights activist” announced his desire to play in the WNBA, a declaration that came amid an ongoing debate about transgender athletes in women’s sports.
Freedom and White are obviously provoking the league. Everybody knows it; they know it, the WNBA knows it, and the gender activists furious about the stunt know it.
Provocation doesn't answer the question.
If self-identification carries enough weight to demand access to women's sports, locker rooms, awards, scholarships, and other female spaces, why does the principle evaporate suddenly when two former NBA players demand a roster spot?
The WNBA could make this very easy. Commissioner Cathy Engelbert could announce that eligibility is based on biological sex and end the debate.
Something tells me that press conference isn't coming.
Doing so would concede the principle Cunningham has been attacked for defending. Refusing to do so leaves the league explaining why some declarations of female identity deserve respect while Freedom's and White's deserve dismissal.
So the WNBA wimped out. Bigly.
It wants all the fashionable language of gender ideology without accepting where that logic can lead in professional competition. Inclusivity is wonderful right up until a 6-foot-10 former NBA center asks where he should pick up his jersey.
The WNBA finally found its red line.
Now it should have the courage to explain what the line is.
Want more conservative commentary that asks the questions institutions would rather dodge? Join PJ Media VIP and save 60% with promo code FIGHT.
Join the conversation as a VIP Member