Get PJ Media on your Apple

Ed Driscoll

You Can’t Fool Thomas Friedman: It’s Sputniks All the Way Down

January 26th, 2011 - 6:33 pm

Wikipedia sums up the famous “turtles all the way down” analogy thusly:

The most widely known version appears in Stephen Hawking‘s 1988 book A Brief History of Time, which starts:

A well-known scientist (some say it was Bertrand Russell) once gave a public lecture on astronomy. He described how the earth orbits around the sun and how the sun, in turn, orbits around the center of a vast collection of stars called our galaxy. At the end of the lecture, a little old lady at the back of the room got up and said: “What you have told us is rubbish. The world is really a flat plate supported on the back of a giant tortoise.” The scientist gave a superior smile before replying, “What is the tortoise standing on?” “You’re very clever, young man, very clever”, said the old lady. “But it’s turtles all the way down!”

For the New York Times’ Thomas Friedman, while the World May Be Flat, it’s standing on Sputniks all the way down. In his latest Best of the Web column, James Taranto credits Friedman for being the likely origin of the president’s now much-parodied Sputnik riff last night:

“Sputnik moment,” however, sounded to us not just false but clichéd. And in fact, it turned out the president himself had trotted out the “our generation’s Sputnik moment” line before, at a Dec. 6, 2010, speech in North Carolina. But we doubted it originated in the White House speechwriting shop. It sounded like the work of a far, far worse writer. Sure enough, our suspicions were confirmed by a book review in the Sept. 9, 2008, edition of the New York Times: “Thomas L. Friedman’s latest book is a plea for a new Sputnik moment.”

Friedman, it turns out, has been beating the Sputnik drum since the Clinton years:

  • “Just as the Soviet launch of Sputnik elevated the importance of science education in the early cold war, the onset of globalization and intensified economic competition is elevating the importance of technology education today.”–March 10, 2000
  • “Think about this. We are facing a mounting crisis in science and engineering education. The generation of scientists, engineers and mathematicians who were spurred to get advanced degrees by the 1957 Soviet launch of Sputnik and the challenge by President John Kennedy to put a man on the moon is slowly retiring.”–Dec. 5, 2004
  • “A few years ago my youngest daughter participated in the National History Day program for eighth graders. . . . My daughter’s project was ‘How Sputnik Led to the Internet.’ ”–June 1, 2005
  • “I came to Detroit looking for the hottest new American cars. Instead, I found Sputnik.”–Jan. 20, 2006
  • “The big question for me is, how will President Bush and the Democratic Congress use China: as a scapegoat or a Sputnik?”–Nov. 10, 2006
  • “We used to try harder and do better. After Sputnik, we came together as a nation and responded with a technology, infrastructure and education surge.”–June 29, 2008
  • “I believe this Chinese decision to go green is the 21st-century equivalent of the Soviet Union’s 1957 launch of Sputnik. . . . Well, folks. Sputnik just went up again: China’s going clean-tech. . . . China is embarking on a new, parallel path of clean power deployment and innovation. It is the Sputnik of our day.”–Sept. 27, 2009
  • “I hope Americans see China’s rise as the 21st-century equivalent of Russia launching the Sputnik satellite. . . . Unfortunately, the Cheneyites want to make fighting Al Qaeda our Sputnik.”–Jan. 16, 2010

Last week, James Bowman of the New Criterion asked, “What is it about writing for The New York Times that makes people stupid?” Perhaps a better question might be, what causes writing for a paper devoted to advancing an ideology that calls itself  “progressivism” to be so devoted to nostalgia?

Click here to view the 15 legacy comments

Comments are closed.