When Socialism Creeps In . . .

The new technocracy also finds mechanisms to live capitalistically while ordering socialism for others. Hypocrisy leads to endemic cynicism. A look at he careers of a Charles Rangel, Maxine Waters, or Chris Dodd, or the tax ethics of a John Kerry, suggest that our statist overseers simply feel exempt from the law in Animal Farm fashion. At the most extreme, one gets the Soviet nomenklatura, while in a less pernicious form the expense-account cheating EU bureaucrat. A certain sort flocks to socialist government to escape accountability and find a good life that his merits would otherwise not earn. The European public workers’ pension system is proof enough of that.

2) Demography. When one demands cradle to grave care, a classical (now scoffed at) reason for childbearing (to change diapers for those who might one day change your own in gratitude) is destroyed. And if there is no struggle to create income and savings (the state provides all needs; the state ensures against all risks; the state takes away most income; the state gobbles most inheritance), why worry about transcendence or passing anything along to children — or why children at all?

Agnosticism leads to a shrinking population and vice versa. If the state is the god, and defines happiness as social justice in the material sense, then the here and now is all that matters. The state defines morality as the greatest good for the greatest number — as it sees it.

Lost is a sense of individual tragedy, self-sacrifice, personal accountability for sin and transgression, and appreciation for a larger world beyond and after this one. A society that does not believe in a hereafter will be sorely disappointed that the state never quite satisfies its appetites. We see that hedonism well enough from Greece to California. "Never enough" (Numquam satis) is the new de facto motto.

3) Defense. It is far harder for a socialist state to defend itself -- unless it is a tyrannical authoritarian one in the Hitlerian or Stalinist model. For a European socialist, why spend collective income on defense, when it might better go to more entitlements and redistribution? Just as everyone is equal at home, and social pathology is a result only of deprivation and exploitation that can be remedied by material redistribution, so too abroad all nations are of equal merit, with the more aggressive simply in need of a global version of Social Security, ObamaCare, or a 70% tax on wealthy nations to transfer ill-gotten funds to poorer ones. Evil is not intrinsic, but results from exploitation that can be remedied without deterrence.

4) Land of the Lotus Eaters? When most of us have public-sector, tenured DMV-like jobs, what is the incentive to do well at work? To increase efficiency to serve the state that always seems to pay our salaries regardless of our office’s productivity or the state’s financial health? To help the public who has the same attitude at work as we do (one statist can spot another a mile away)?

There is no good, no bad, just everything and everyone the same. We see that now in a socialization of culture, quite apart from government -- in everything from degraded titles and honorifics to block-style socialist apartment buildings. (One does not have to go to Eastern Europe to see the ugly cinder block urban apartments; there are plenty in a France, Italy, or Greece or urban renewal in our large cities.) State-supported art, literature, and music are usually bland, about what you expect when art serves ideology or, like Dutch-supported art, is designed to provide employment regardless of merit. Our society becomes like tee ball, with good intentions replacing runs scored.

When I enter a state Athenian bank, I see 10 Greek employees literally doing nothing other than serving coffee to each other or stamping forms, and long lines of petulant customer clerks who are thinking, “Damn, they are doing to me what I do to them to at my own state job!”

5. Mediocrity. To ensure equality, socialism must take the top down. That is far easier than bringing the bottom up. In schools, that means far more invested in remediation than in honors. That prime directive translates into 15 valedictorians rather than one. In our fairer worlds, 75% receive As rather than 20%. We are heading to a society where we are degreed and certified — and all know very little. What would be the point of erudition when it would mean that recall, speech, writing, and reference would be beyond the majority's comprehension and therefore of no social utility? Why have a Tolstoy when at the ministry of education a committee can issue novels with far better themes of diversity and gender equity?

Only in things less important like sports does pure merit still count. Oh, if Obama would only leave the economy alone and turn his statist attention to socializing basketball. Imagine:

Diversity: 20 person teams with racially imposed diversity matching national demography;

Fairness: each team required to play 20 minutes with their poorest percentage shooters;

Egalitarianism: at reaching 40 points, a scorer is forced to leave one team and join the other;

Social justice: last year’s bottom-half teams start the new season with an automatic 10 wins; a behind team gets 3 points for every basket until it catches up;

The safety net: ObamaCare and only ObamaCare for all athletes;

Saving jobs: federal take-overs and buyouts of money-losing franchises;

The goal? 30 equal teams, each with a 40 wins/40 losses record.

Leave health care to us, and work on the NBA instead.