01-21-2019 09:04:27 PM -0800
01-21-2019 05:12:14 PM -0800
01-21-2019 10:26:58 AM -0800
01-21-2019 07:52:07 AM -0800
01-20-2019 01:01:48 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Watch Cory Booker Manterrupt and Mansplain to a Woman for 10 Solid Minutes

About a year ago, Massachusetts Senator (and honorary Native American) Elizabeth Warren made the news for being interrupted by a man. She was giving a speech on the floor of the Senate about... I forget the topic, something or other. It doesn't matter what she was talking about. The point is that she's a woman, and a man told her to stop speaking. A man invoked his male privilege. He manterrupted her.

This is a bad thing. Come on, guys, it's [current year]! As a society, shouldn't we have moved past interrupting women by now?

Warren even got her very own hashtag out of it: #NeverthelessShePersisted. It became a rallying cry. Whenever a feminist started to lose an argument, she'd just throw down a #NeverthelessShePersisted. Take that, you stupid men!

A few months later, something similar happened to Sen. Kamala Harris. And it was even worse that time because, unlike Sen. Warren, Harris is legitimately a woman of color.

Pretty sexist, huh? Also racist, but mostly sexist.

But that was then, and this is now. Rules are for the other team. That's why Senator Cory Booker could get away with the performance you're about to see. Yesterday he furiously berated DHS Secretary Kirstjen Nielsen for 10 straight minutes about President Trump reportedly calling third-world countries "$#!+holes." Booker was supposed to be questioning Nielsen, but instead, he just yelled at her and told her to shut up when she tried to get a word in edgewise:

I thought Nielsen comported herself well. She let that grandstanding doofus scream his head off, and then she responded to his spittle-flecked tirade calmly and rationally. She behaved professionally, and he behaved like a guy who wants Trump's job and is trying to set himself apart from the pack.

Maybe you agree with Cory Booker. Maybe you think Trump is a racist, and the "$#!+hole" comment is emblematic of it.* Maybe you're as angry as Booker is trying to convince us he is. Does that give him the right to speak to a woman like this? Does that give him license to rant and rave and scold her when she tries to respond?

Of course it does. After all, he's a Democrat and she's a Republican.

If the parties were reversed, such a public display would be called "angry" and "disturbing" instead of "impassioned" and "emotional." Booker would be labeled a sexist and a misogynist. The lefty tweets would all insinuate the same thing: "I notice that Cory Booker, the filthy Republican that he is, doesn't talk to other men that way..." Nielsen would be designated a victim, which is the highest status attainable in 21st Century America. It would prove everything Democrats knew about the world already.