12-14-2018 09:10:01 PM -0800
12-14-2018 11:13:25 AM -0800
12-14-2018 10:00:59 AM -0800
12-13-2018 04:11:41 PM -0800
12-13-2018 01:40:43 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.
X


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Trump Vows Warlike Posture if Dems Inundate Him with Investigations

Like many conservative baby-boomers, I watched Fox News' post-midterm analysis over the weekend, seeking information, expertise, and opinion from the pundit class. I also read pieces about the election on this website, and several of the related links over at Instapundit.

For the record, I never go anywhere near leftist broadcast and cable news or analysis. I know what they’re selling—sheer Democrat partisanship—and I haven’t bought it since Ronald Reagan was in office. If FNC didn’t constantly run clips from CNN and MSNBC while harping on the extreme bias of Don Lemon, Jim Acosta, Rachel Maddow, and others, I would never see or hear these people. (Note to self: idea for another column.)

As of this Monday morning, I have not yet sampled conservative talk radio, but I’m about to do what Rush Limbaugh admonishes us never to do: I’m going to try this at home.

And I won’t bury the lede: If House Democrats hit the ground running in January with an overarching investigatory agenda, President Trump will have no choice but to follow through on his warning to adopt a “warlike posture” in response.

And if you think the Democrats will forego a full-scale effort to probe and hobble Mr. Trump’s administration, I’ve got a 1979 40-year anniversary commemorative Jimmy Carter Rose Garden Strategy white paper to send to your home address.

Two main themes/issues have emerged from the election: (A) virtually deadlocked races in Florida, Arizona and Georgia — dead-heats complicated by alleged attempts at vote fraud, and (B) the question of exactly how the new Democrat majority will proceed vis-a-vis investigations versus legislation. Is there anything House Democrats, a Republican Senate, and the president can get together on?

Hopes for a bipartisan infrastructure package are typically floated like mid-November NFL “Hail Mary" passes. Great. Let’s get Rep. Nancy Pelosi, Sen. Mitch McConnell, and President Trump together on a plan to improve our nation’s roads, bridges, airports. Who could be against that?

There’s one insurmountable problem: If Ms. Pelosi allows representatives like Adam Schiff and Maxine Waters to chart the course for the new House majority, we are surely headed for a morass of investigations, recriminations, pay-backs, and gridlock. Congressman Schiff is a man grotesquely twisted by hatred for the president. Maxine Waters' loathing for Trump, his administration, and supporters have helped set an unprecedentedly low bar for political incivility, and virtually guaranteed an uncompromising relationship between Republicans and Democrats in the run-up to 2020.

Slipping into cultural vernacular here, many Beltway-watchers got their drawers and panties in a bunch over Trump’s “warlike posture” admonition. The argument goes: Trump and the party he now owns should work for a bipartisan accord on issues that will benefit the nation even if a Democrat House is working overtime to take him out.