Top 10 Reasons Liberals Reflexively Blame the NRA for Shootings
Almost as soon as the news of the shooting at YouTube headquarters broke on Tuesday, the usual frothing band of liberals fired up their boilerplate hate tweets and comments for the NRA. Actor Michael Ian Black (Language Warning) took no time to reflexively (and angrily) tweet out the now fashionable "terrorist organization" line.
Of course, none of America's mass shooters have been NRA members. The NRA doesn't, as many liberals erroneously claim, provide weapons to people.
So then why are the anti-gun leftists so quick to smear millions of law-abiding Americans whenever a shooting occurs?
Here are my Top 10 reasons.
10: They're Rage-Filled and Projecting
By the way, I'm using screen shots for some of these tweets because it is the way of the bold, brave Twitter liberal to say something outrageously offensive and threatening, then erase it as soon as too much negative attention comes their way.
Our gal Jenny here is so hate-filled that she doesn't care if the children of the people who disagree with her die. She's got anger issues. Most liberals do. They also love to project, so they just assume that everyone who has a gun will one day use it to harm someone. Because that's what they would do.
9: They're Not Really Fans of History
This guy is a prime example:
Two of the top three mass shootings in the United States were committed by guys named Omar Saddiqui Mateen and Seung-Hui Cho.
Two of the top three.
The tenth on that list was the terrorist attack by Syed Rizwan Farook and his wife Tashfeen Malik.
To save everyone the Google time, none of them are white guys.
To the chagrin of anti-gun leftists everywhere, the political leanings of most of these shooters are difficult to determine. Their perverse dream is that a registered Republican with a lifetime NRA membership will one day open fire just so they can say, "Told ya!"
It is a dream that has thus far remained unfulfilled.
The shooter at YouTube was a female, so hat is on the menu for this guy.