01-18-2019 07:06:15 AM -0800
01-17-2019 03:39:53 PM -0800
01-17-2019 12:48:37 PM -0800
01-17-2019 07:54:10 AM -0800
01-17-2019 06:55:32 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

The GOP Senate Leadership Fund's Disingenuous Criticism of Steve Bannon

Steve Bannon? Lots of people love the guy. Lots don't.

The Senate Leadership Fund is definitely in the latter group. We know this because they made it pretty clear with this tweet:

Wow. A big difference between 2014, when Jeff Sessions took every county in the state, and 2017. Clearly, Bannon blew it, right?

Well ...

There's no doubt that Roy Moore failed miserably with GOP turnout, but we must first examine how the two campaigns were very different. First of all, Sessions ran unopposed in 2014.


Actually, I'm done investigating. We're just going to stop right there.

Sessions took every single county in the state of Alabama, and 97.3% of the vote. Because Democrats literally didn't put a name on the ballot. Sessions beat the hell out of "write-in."

Know who also would have beat the hell out of "write-in"? Roy Moore.

There are plenty of reasonable criticisms to level at Bannon and the Moore campaign in general, but it's thoroughly obnoxious to compare them to Sessions' victory against ______. It undermines any point they were trying to make, and instead made the point that the Senate Leadership Fund has no respect for Republican voters.

The comparison possibly worth making is with Trump's 2016 results in Alabama, which were of course much more red than Moore's in 2017.

Although -- of course -- Bannon ran that campaign.

So maybe lay off Bannon here, SLF. Obviously Moore's previously unknown character issues were the problem, not Bannon's skill.