08-17-2018 04:37:57 PM -0700
08-17-2018 09:43:17 AM -0700
08-17-2018 08:55:05 AM -0700
Sir Ben Kingsley Predicts Another Holocaust
08-16-2018 11:10:39 AM -0700
08-16-2018 09:03:31 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Salon Lectures Republicans on Christian Charity, Forgets Welfare Isn't Charity

Christianity has some very specific things to say about taking care of the poor. People of the Christian faith are charged with giving to the needy and helping the poor and sick.

Salon, however, thinks Republican Christians are ignoring their faith. Never mind that many conservatives aren't Christians in the first place, Salon argues that the GOP is working against the Bible with their tax plan.

Yes, really.

In "Taxing the rich to help the poor? What the Bible says isn’t what the GOP says," writer Mathew Schmalz goes into great detail on the moral failings of the GOP. In particular, he attacks opposition to welfare programs that divert money from those who earn it and give it to those who do not.

Unfortunately, he fails at every level.

It's not charitable to spend other people's money on the poor. This isn't rocket science. Yet liberals continue to miss the point over and over again.

When the government takes money from people under threat of force, it takes away people's ability to help the poor. Worse, however, is that for many people the government also takes away any feeling of obligation to help the poor. "I pay taxes. What more do you want?" they ask.

However, government is horribly inefficient at distributing much of anything.

Any program requires a bureaucracy to manage it, and bureaucracies rarely do anything nearly as well as the private citizen. And the more a government program grows, the more funds are required for the care and feeding of that bureaucracy, thus leaving fewer funds for the needy.

But private charity is something that can be monitored. We can send our charitable contributions to groups that we know to be both effective and efficient. We can punish those that aren't a good steward of money by no longer giving them any.

With government, that's not an option. If you fail to give them the money they crave, you get to explain yourself to people with guns. Then they take the money anyways.

None of this touches on the institutional poverty that government welfare programs create simply by existing.

Look, I get it. I want to help the poor too. Until very recently, I was living well beneath the poverty line, so I know what it's like to be poor. It sucks.

However, while helping the poor is a priority for many of us, it would be nice if those who are yelling so loudly about helping the poor would front their own money for a change.

You know, actual charity such as is described in the Bible.