09-20-2018 10:29:38 AM -0700
09-20-2018 08:44:42 AM -0700
09-19-2018 04:17:25 PM -0700
09-19-2018 01:49:53 PM -0700
09-19-2018 06:50:04 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.
X


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Not 'Toxic Masculinity,' but None: Most Mass Shooters Are Fatherless

For feminists, "toxic masculinity" is the ultimate bogeyman. It can represent anything they want it to represent, regardless of whether it's a legitimate aspect of masculinity or not.

The latest claim from feminists has been that "toxic masculinity" is responsible for mass shootings like Parkland.

However, that claim may be the opposite of reality.

The Conservative Millennial brings up excellent points about why fathers matter: "26 out of the last 27 deadliest mass shooters were fatherless. ... That’s why boys who grow up in single-mother homes are twice as likely to commit crimes than those who grow up with a present dad. That’s why both sons and daughters are more likely to become depressed without a strong relationship with their father. That’s why 71% of high school dropouts are fatherless."

"If masculinity were truly toxic, then wouldn’t boys and girls who grow up without dads be happier and healthier? If it were better that men were more like women, wouldn’t kids be just as content with a mom than with having a father, too?"

How do these boys without fathers manage to become so imbued with "toxic masculinity" that they lash out and try to kill everyone?

They don't. So-called "toxic masculinity" isn't the problem. It has never been. It's a bogeyman feminists use to advance their cause. It's another way feminists can paint the female of the species as somehow superior and worthy of emulation, even by men.

But you can't blame masculinity when it seems that the problems you want to fix stem from households without a man present.

These boys are growing up without worthy role models, people whom they can model their behavior on. Instead, they fill the void with entertainers and athletes, people who may or may not be decent people. They find people in their neighborhoods they think are worthy of emulation, never realizing that these supposedly "worthy" people are the scum of the Earth.