12-17-2018 12:30:12 PM -0800
12-17-2018 09:31:43 AM -0800
12-16-2018 07:57:15 PM -0800
12-16-2018 10:25:25 AM -0800
12-15-2018 03:54:52 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

New Yorker Mag: Chick-fil-A Infiltrating Manhattan With 'Pervasive Christian Traditionalism'

The New Yorker magazine has devoted most of its non-fiction energy these past two years to railing against President Trump. On Friday, writer Dan Piebenbring departed from that editorial directive to decry the public popularity of Chick-fil-A restaurants in New York City:

One might dismiss the silliness of "evangelizing cows," but Piepenbring is quite earnest. The tweet from the official New Yorker account was even more full of gloom and doom:

The use of the word "arrival" is curious as the restaurant chain opened its first store in Manhattan back in 2015. There were complaints back then too. Well, there was a complaint -- New York Mayor Bill de Blasio implored New Yorkers to boycott the restaurant.

That worked so well that Chick-fil-A opened another Manhattan store not too long after.

The fourth and newest Chick-fil-A location in Manhattan is the source of consternation for Piepenbring and The New Yorker. It is also the largest location in the world for the chain.

Progressive disdain for the company is nothing new. In 2012 a nationwide boycott was organized to protest the fact that the charitable foundation of the Cathy family -- who own the company -- had donated to pro-family charities deemed "anti-LGBT" by progressives. That, for the most part, ended three years ago. Despite that fact, Piepenbring cites that early on as one of the reasons he doesn't like Chick-fil-A.

The article is an odd commentary describing something virtually unrecognizable to anyone who has ever set foot inside of a Chick-fil-A.

After noting that the restaurant was busy, he launches into his point about the "infiltration" of "Christian traditionalism" by noting that Chick-fil-A headquarters feature "Bible verses and a statue of Jesus." He never does explain how a statue in Atlanta infiltrates Manhattan.

Piepenbring also mentions the fact that the stores are closed on Sunday, which should only be a problem for someone who actually likes eating at Chick-fil-A.

Is there something you'd like to share, Dan?

He likens the new Manhattan location to a "megachurch" and says that the restaurant's "arrival in the city augurs worse than a load of manure on the F train."

Remember, we're still talking about chicken sandwiches here.

The cows that the chain uses in its advertising seem to be almost as problematic for Piepenbring as the company's Christian roots. He devotes four full paragraphs to them because he wonders "why Americans fell in love with an ad in which one farm animal begs us to kill another in its place."