02-22-2019 04:41:18 PM -0800
02-21-2019 02:04:47 PM -0800
02-21-2019 11:01:19 AM -0800
02-20-2019 06:05:04 PM -0800
02-20-2019 04:41:47 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

London Museum Uses Feminist Term 'Womxn,' Angering ... Feminists

The Wellcome Collection, a museum in London, has found itself targeted by feminists after its attempt to please feminists by using the “inclusive” term “womxn.”

The BBC reports that the museum’s usage of "womxn" in a tweeted announcement led to “backlash from hundreds of women, and an apology from the organisation.”

That’s right, ladies and gentlemen (or whatever you identify as): feminists and trans women are offended by a term that seeks to erase the word “men” from the word “women” because -- wait for it -- it denies their womanhood:

To be clear, “womxn” is a feminist invention. According to Urban Dictionary (I tried looking it up in a real dictionary but, well, it’s not a word), “womxn” is “a more inclusive, progressive term that not only sheds light on the prejudice, discrimination, and institutional barriers womxn have faced, but to also show that womxn are not the extension of men.”

The basic concept: “womxn” erases the word “men” from the word “women.” This isn't new -- you may have seen another version, "womyn," used by feminists over the past few decades. However, as Urban Dictionary adds, “womxn” is “more intersectional than womyn because it includes trans-women and women of color.” (Because the letter “y” is totally racist and transphobic, I’ve been meaning to talk to it about that.)

All of this makes the backlash against Wellcome Collection hilariously nonsensical. Twitter user Suzie Leighton writes:

I’ll be a womxn when men become mxn. Until then jog on and stop eroding women’s rights.

But if men become “mxn,” then wouldn’t “womxn” need to revert to “women” to not be an extension of “mxn"?

And, really, if the terms are going to be “womxn” and “mxn” then we might as well go back to “women” and “men,” because humans can pronounce those.

Or is the idea that women shouldn’t have to be the ones to change? But, if so, doesn’t that imply that the term “women” is already its own entity and that, perhaps, “men” was derived from “women” and not the other way around? Hmm, that’s obviously untrue -- so that must be what feminists think:

Jennie Kermode, chair of the campaign group Trans Media Watch, explained why "womxn" is an outrage:

We would generally just write women in the usual way because we feel it's important for people to recognise that trans women are women. ... Trans women aren't a special, separate category.