12-12-2018 10:18:40 AM -0800
12-12-2018 07:39:32 AM -0800
12-11-2018 02:41:26 PM -0800
12-11-2018 01:01:06 PM -0800
12-11-2018 07:40:58 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

So Just Why Is the Left Acknowledging Clinton's Sexual Deviancy Now?

William Jefferson Clinton is long out of the White House. While it looked like he'd be back, allbeit in a different role, that didn't happen. Instead, he's on the outside looking in, much like any other American citizen.

The former president is still very much a part of the national conversation, but not for the reasons he might prefer.

In the wake of Harvey Weinstein and the implosion of Hollywood amid a myriad of accusations of sexual assault and sexual harassment, followed by the alleged foibles of a certain Senate candidate from Alabama named Roy Moore, talk of sexual misconduct is on the tip of almost every tongue.

Now, even the Left is starting to consider whether it's time to talk about Bill Clinton's misdeeds with women.

Make no mistake, this is hardly groundbreaking news. The allegations against Clinton were well-known from before he was elected to the White House. His supporters, much like Moore's backers, simply opted to not believe the allegations against their beloved candidate.

Unfortunately, for some time now, the Left has taken the position that all women deserve to be believed. It's a mantra chanted by them as if it were some kind of magic spell that would make everyone agree.

Yet it's also a sign of hypocrisy that they continued to ignore the words of Juanita Broaddrick and Paula Jones. At no point was this more evident than after Hillary's ill-advised tweet that all women should be believed. She was mocked and derided over that tweet, but as feminists love to say, "nevertheless, she persisted."

In the process, she revealed the Left's hypocrisy. All women deserve to be believed ... to a point.

Then allegations surfaced regarding Roy Moore, a bugaboo for the Left if ever there was one. Moore is notoriously evangelical in his life and his politics, a perfect storm of things progressives fear about the American Right. They're desperate to keep him out of office, and since he hails from one of the reddest of red states, there wasn't much hope.

But then the Washington Post story surfaced, and suddenly they had an in. Even many who don't buy into the argument that all sexual assault accusers should be believed are finding the accusations credible. After all, there are over 30 sources for the story. Democrats finally had a way in. After all, no man so accused of such misconduct should be elected to office.

Except for that Clinton baggage.

Clinton had been accused of sexual misconduct and not only had it been ignored, but even Gloria Steinem took to the pages of The New York Times to engage in behavior any man would be eviscerated by feminists for doing. She not only defended Clinton but attacked his accusers -- everything we're not supposed to do.