06-25-2018 07:27:55 AM -0700
06-25-2018 06:08:20 AM -0700
06-24-2018 07:05:35 PM -0700
06-24-2018 01:33:26 PM -0700
06-23-2018 11:28:09 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Judge Rules in Favor of Student Accused of 'Racist, Threatening Language'

A student at the University of Vermont can breathe a little easier after a judge ruled in his favor. Wesley Richter had been accused of "explicitly racist and threatening language" against both black students at the school and the school's diversity initiatives.

The judge dismissed the case after two months of review, citing a lack of probable cause.

Chittenden County State's Attorney Sarah George told WCAX: "It is what it is. We put our best case forward. The judge looked at the law. We see it differently, but that's what the process is for."

When asked if she still thinks she should have filed charges, George responded: "What we allege he did, we still allege he did. It just didn't rise to the level of a hate crime."

This case should never have been prosecuted.

Richter was apparently having a phone conversation in the library multimedia room with his mother when he made the statement, one that hasn't been released to the public. There were allegedly three witnesses. One reported it. Of the other two, one refused to cooperate with investigators and the other said the comments didn't happen.

How could that possibly be considered sufficient evidence to file charges? How?