01-09-2018 01:54:15 PM -0800
12-22-2017 09:40:32 AM -0800
06-07-2017 12:17:49 PM -0700
05-09-2017 03:25:43 PM -0700
04-26-2017 09:52:11 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Helping White Male Athletes Reinforces ‘White Supremacy,’ Prof Argues

Is Life a White Privilege Too?

A business professor at the University of Technology Sydney recently argued that helping white male athletes take classes online can reinforce “white privilege.”

Helena Liu made the argument in a new article for the journal Whiteness and Education, detailing it as one of many ways that “white power passes through the bodies of people of colour in higher education institutions.”

Co-authored with Ekaterina Pechenkina, a professor at the City University of New York, the article argues that professors of color can “become instrumentalized into the white supremacist practices of their institution.”

This is because minority professors are asked to maintain “the status quo of white privilege” through their various interactions with other professors, administrators and students, Liu and Pechenkina write.

One example of this is how professors are asked to make accomodations for white male athletes, Liu wrote. Because of the intense training schedules of some athletes in Australia, many need to take certain required classes online instead of in-person to graduate.

After being asked to make accommodations for a notable “white middle-class male athlete” to study with her by email, as all other professors at her school agreed to do, Liu argued that this was a way that minority professors are used as “instruments of white supremacy.”

“As I mulled over the possibility of accommodating for the student over the next day, the nagging feeling [about his race] would not go away,” she wrote, further contrasting the white privilege of the male athlete with the lack of privilege her minority students have.

Ultimately, Liu decided not to help the student. Her reason was ostensibly his race, since immediately after writing that she declined to help him, she mused if she should bring the issue of the student’s white privilege to the attention of the administration.

“I decided not to push back on the issue of racial privilege, following my intuition that it might be too risky as a female academic of colour to be seen as paradoxically hypersensitive (about racism) and insensitive (about student needs),” she wrote.

Further, Liu argued that being asked to help this white student in the first place was also illustrative of “white power.” This is because the student’s advisor, who asked Liu on his behalf, was allegedly “blind to the racial relations” at play within the university, since many minority students don’t have an advisor to go to bat for them.

In conclusion, Liu and Pechenkina argue that simple requests like the one detailed above are actually ways that professors of color are  asked to serve as “weapons of whiteness” to “reinforce white privilege” while on the job. Refusing to go out of their way to help white athletes is just one way of “resisting white domination” in higher education, they wrote.