10-23-2018 11:29:26 AM -0700
10-23-2018 08:15:43 AM -0700
10-23-2018 06:52:12 AM -0700
10-22-2018 12:21:07 PM -0700
10-22-2018 09:32:15 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.
X


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Grassley Demands That DOJ Unredact Name in Strzok-Page Text That Says 'White House is Running This'

Chairman Charles Grassley, R-Iowa, conducts a Senate Judiciary hearing.

The Senate Judiciary Committee chairman is demanding to know why the Justice Department made some suspicious redactions in text messages between anti-Trump FBI lovebirds Peter Strzok and Lisa Page. Senator Chuck Grassley (R-IA) is particularly interested in a text that suggested the Obama “White House is running this,” in reference, most likely, to the Trump-Russia  investigation.

“Went well, best we could have expected. Other than [REDACTED] quote, ‘the White House is running this’,” Strzok wrote to Page on Aug. 5, 2016. “My answer, ‘well, maybe for you they are.’”

Page replied: “Yeah, whatever (re WH comment). We’ve got emails that say otherwise.”

The Justice Department has made a habit of redacting information from documents under the pretense of protecting sources and methods, but really to spare the agency involved of embarrassment and/or complicity -- and Senator Grassley has had enough.

Grassley sent a letter to Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein on Wednesday, calling for all redactions to be removed. He cited as an example of an unnecessary redaction in a text message, "the price of Andrew McCabe’s $70,000 conference table."

“Congress, and the public, have a right to know how the Justice Department spends taxpayer money," Grassley wrote. "I am unaware of any legitimate basis on which the cost of a conference table should be redacted. Embarrassment is not a good enough reason. The manner in which some redactions have been used casts doubt on whether the remaining redactions are necessary and defensible,” Grassley continued.

"In another, an official’s name was redacted in reference to a text about the Obama White House 'running' an investigation, although it is unclear to which investigation they were referring," Grassley wrote.

He added: “When viewing the still redacted portions in context with the unredacted material, it appeared that the redacted portions may contain relevant information relating to the Committee’s ongoing investigation into the matter in which the Department of Justice and FBI handled the Clinton and Russia investigations.”

The letter follows two committee sessions in which staff were allowed to view less-redacted versions of the texts between Strzok and Page.

A day after the pair talked about "the White House running this," Page sent Strzok a link to a Glamour article about then-President Barack Obama.

“Okay, so maybe not the best national security president, but a genuinely good and decent human being,” Page wrote.

Strzok replied: “Yeah, I like him. Just not a fan of the weakness globally. Was thinking about what the administration would be willing to do re Russia.”