02-19-2019 07:26:59 AM -0800
02-18-2019 09:36:51 AM -0800
02-18-2019 07:35:39 AM -0800
02-17-2019 12:39:26 PM -0800
02-17-2019 08:18:34 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

GOP Rep. to Introduce Carbon Tax Legislation

Rep. Carlos Curbelo says he will introduce legislation next week that would create a $23-per-ton tax on carbon emissions from oil refineries, gas processing plants and coal mine mouths beginning in 2020.

The bill would also severely limit the ability of the EPA to regulate industry emissions.

E&E News:

Industrial sectors such as cement, aluminum, steel and glass would also pay the fee for emissions stemming from physical or chemical reactions outside of energy production. Sources said Curbelo's office was shopping that version of the bill last week.

The tax would escalate 2 percent above inflation annually. If the decline in emissions fails to reach certain levels, the carbon tax would increase by an additional $2 per ton the following year.

Modeling, which the draft text notes is "still under development," suggests the plan would reduce fossil fuel emissions 24 percent below 2005 levels in 2020, and 30 percent below 2005 levels in 2032. For comparison, former President Obama's target under the Paris climate accord was 26 to 28 percent below 2005 levels by 2025. President Trump has said the United States will withdraw from the climate pact.

The draft bill attempts to strike a compromise between environmental and Democratic advocates of greenhouse gas reduction policies and a growing number of center-right organizations that promote a carbon tax as a conservative solution to climate change.

It would halt — but not kill — EPA regulations on greenhouse gas emissions so long as the tax meets its goals to cut carbon emissions. The draft legislation contains check-in points in 2025 and 2029 to consider reinstating regulations if the tax hasn't curbed enough greenhouse gases. The moratorium would sunset after 2033 if emissions goals are met. That provision is meant to address concerns from Democrats and environmental groups, which generally oppose forfeiting EPA's authority to regulate carbon in exchange for a carbon tax.

The bill doesn't have a chance of passage in the House and there are no plans for any similar bill to be introduced in the Senate. On top of that, the House is considering a resolution which will probably pass that calls carbon taxes "detrimental" to the economy.

But there is the germ of an idea in this bill that might be useful in the near future. The Highway Trust Fund is going broke. Vitally needed road and bridge repairs across the country are not being performed because proceeds from the gas tax, which is the current funding mechanism for the fund, have been falling steadily in recent years due to more fuel-efficient cars and people driving less.

Another way must be found to fund these infrastructure projects. Most of the revenue gained from a carbon tax would go into the fund: