07-20-2018 11:40:18 AM -0700
07-19-2018 01:47:29 PM -0700
07-19-2018 10:16:35 AM -0700
07-19-2018 07:10:51 AM -0700
07-18-2018 06:46:32 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Google-Friendly Sex Trafficking Bill Moves Out of House Judiciary Committee

Google logo

On Tuesday, the anti-sex trafficking bill (FOSTA) passed through the House Judiciary Committee...with some serious baggage dragging behind it as it heads for a full House vote. From NextGov.com:

A controversial bill originally targeting online sex traffickers got the House Judiciary Committee’s stamp of approval on Tuesday after lawmakers expanded the legislation to criminalize all prostitution activities on the internet.

As it moves along to a House vote, the Allow States and Victims to Fight Online Sex Trafficking Act threw a wrench into a months-long debate on how to curb online trafficking while protecting tech companies from frivolous lawsuits. The amended version of FOSTA won over some of the bill’s original opponents, but it lost the support of others who claim the revised bill lacks its original teeth.

Here's why it's controversial:

According to Politico, Goodlatte is pushing an amendment to Sen. Rob Portman’s anti-sex-trafficking bill that “would limit the civil liability tech platforms could face.”

Supporters of Portman’s bill are angry about the move, charging it undercuts the bill’s effectiveness and calling it “harmful to the rights of victims.”

Thirty different groups and sex crime victims urged the committee not to approve the change to the bill.

Do you know who the largest opponent of Portman's Senate sex trafficking bill is? Google. And you know who is the second largest donor to soon-to-be-retiring Judiciary Committee chair Bob Goodlatte (R-VA) is? Google. Red State has a nice round-up of all Goodlatte's campaign loot from Google.

Mary Mazzio, director of "I Am Jane Doe," a documentary film about online sex trafficking and the website Backpage.com, called the change "harmful to the rights of victims" and questioned why the House bill has undergone the change, Ashley reports.

And Sen. Portman also hit the proposed legislation for its added protection for Google. “Here in the Senate, we have a carefully-crafted, bipartisan solution that has the support of all major stakeholders, including victims and advocates, faith-based groups, law enforcement, and the larger tech community,” Portman (R-OH) a co-sponsor of that bill, said. “This new House proposal is opposed by advocates because they’re concerned it is actually worse for victims than current law.

Here is a good explanation of why Google would defend Backpage.com, a website involved in 73% of sex trafficking in the United States:

The answer has to do with Section 230 of the Communications Decency Act, which protects internet companies like Google (and The New York Times) from lawsuits — and also protects Backpage. Google seems to have a vague, poorly grounded fear that closing the loophole would open the way to frivolous lawsuits and investigations and lead to a slippery slope that will damage its interests and the freedom of the internet.