Democrats' Legal 'Expert' Called for Trump's Impeachment Over a Tweet in March 2017

On Monday, House Judiciary Committee Chairman Jerry Nadler (D-N.Y.) announced four legal scholars who will be called as witnesses during his committee's impeachment inquiry. Three of the scholars were chosen by Democrats, one by Republicans.

One of the legal scholars chosen by Democrats is Harvard Law School professor Noah Feldman. As Breitbart notes, Feldman "was taken in by the 'Russia collusion' conspiracy theory, claiming in September 2017 that 'more and more evidence of collusion between Donald Trump’s presidential campaign and Russia has come to light,'" even though none was found by the Mueller investigation.

In fact, Feldman has been foaming at the mouth over impeachment for virtually the entirety of Trump's presidency. Believe it or not, Feldman actually believed that Trump should be impeached over the following tweet:

On March 6, 2017, two days after Trump made this tweet, an opinion piece by Feldman was published at Bloomberg in which he argued, "If the president has made false claims of a crime without proof, there's only one constitutional remedy," and that remedy is impeachment.

The sitting president has accused his predecessor of an act that could have gotten the past president impeached. That’s not your ordinary exercise of free speech. If the accusation were true, and President Barack Obama ordered a warrantless wiretap of Donald Trump during the campaign, the scandal would be of Watergate-level proportions.

But if the allegation is not true and is unsupported by evidence, that too should be a scandal on a major scale. This is the kind of accusation that, taken as part of a broader course of conduct, could get the current president impeached. We shouldn’t care that the allegation was made early on a Saturday morning on Twitter.

It's a poorly written argument, to be sure, which interestingly enough justifies suing virtually the entire Democratic Party and the media of libel (or slander, depending on the situation) for accusing President Trump of colluding with Russia. This is who Democrats have picked as a legal scholar. It seems to me his only real qualification is that he's been advocating for Trump's impeachment since the beginning, and has been constantly searching for a crime to justify it.

And I haven't even gotten to the fact that what Trump said was true. Wiretapping occurred and was the result of a FISA warrant based on a bogus dossier paid for by the Clinton campaign. Feldman wrote that if Trump's allegation was true, "the scandal would be of Watergate-level proportions." It's funny how attitudes change, isn't it?

I feel sorry for anyone who has this guy as a professor at Harvard Law School. Noah Feldman literally wanted Trump impeached over a tweet.

Whistleblower Lawyer Defends Tweet Celebrating Deep State 'Coup' Against Trump

_____

Matt Margolis is the author of Trumping Obama: How President Trump Saved Us From Barack Obama's Legacy and the bestselling book The Worst President in History: The Legacy of Barack Obama. You can follow Matt on Twitter @MattMargolis