09-19-2018 04:17:25 PM -0700
09-19-2018 01:49:53 PM -0700
09-19-2018 06:50:04 AM -0700
09-18-2018 12:35:56 PM -0700
09-18-2018 09:56:59 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.
X


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Activist Lash Out at Pick for Harvard President

Lawrence Bacow is a white male economist. In some people's minds, that makes him a horrible choice to be the president of Harvard University. We know the Left thinks this because they feel the need to tell us constantly.

Theoretical physicist Chanda Prescod-Weinstein tweeted: "Y'all can spin it as a another immigration story but Harvard was founded by and for white immigrants and it's been pretty clearly established that white Jews can enter the corridors of power -- including former Harvard presidents Larry Summers and Neil Rudenstine [Summers' predecessor]."

Then there's this comment from Sara Goldrick-Rab, a Temple University-based "scholar-activist."

While reading all of this, I couldn't help but think about the flip side of something like this. Let's say we had a mirror image taking place. What if a black woman had been hired for this role and someone started off by calling it nothing but "affirmative action"?eee

Anyone making such a claim, especially after seeing the person was qualified for the role, would be labeled by folks like Goldrick-Rab and Prescod-Weinstein (and WTF is up with all the hyphens?) as being racist jackasses.

And they might have a point.

So why is it acceptable to scream about racial privilege regardless of the man's qualifications?

If Bacow isn't qualified, that's one thing. Yet no one is alleging that. It doesn't seem as if anyone thinks Bacow is incapable of doing the work, or lacks the credentials for such a coveted role.