05-14-2019 01:57:15 PM -0400
05-09-2019 05:01:30 PM -0400
05-09-2019 01:41:48 PM -0400
04-18-2019 10:46:35 AM -0400
04-18-2019 10:18:40 AM -0400
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Social Justice Warriors Attack S.E. Hinton for Saying Outsiders Weren't Gay

In May, an article ran in Vanity Fair decrying a scene from the film Captain America: Civil War. Apparently, Captain America kissing Sharon Carter somehow ruined the movie because it meant that he wasn't gay:

“People can interpret the relationship however they want to interpret it,” Joe Russo said while visiting China. “People have interpreted that relationship all kinds of ways, and it’s great to see people argue about it what that relationship means to them. We will never define it as filmmakers, explicitly, but however people want to interpret it they can interpret it.”

But despite what Joe Russo said, doesn’t Captain America: Civil War go out of its way to “define” Bucky and Steve’s relationship when Cap smooches Sharon Carter (Emily VanCamp) while Bucky looks on approvingly? Where’s the room for interpretation in that moment? And, leaving aside the vague creepiness of Steve making a move on Peggy’s (very willing) niece, the moment itself wasn’t necessary to the flow of the movie at all.

Of course, the Vanity Fair piece completely ignores the fact that both Captain America and his best buddy were clearly interested in women during the first movie.

What's especially amusing is that Vanity Fair is actually being un-progressive here: the filmmakers said they wouldn't explicitly define the relationship, and Vanity Fair somehow figured a character kissing a woman rules out every other possibility except pure heterosexuality.

And here I thought the "B" in "LGBT" stood for bisexual. Guess not.

In both instances, however, people are upset because their agenda didn't pan out. They can claim Hinton was "rude" all they want, but it's clear they just didn't like her factual answer. Just like the Vanity Fair author simply didn't like how Cap and Bucky's relationship worked out.

When people create works of fiction, you're free to interpret them any way you want. But if you decide that the creators' differing intentions mean you suddenly hate them and their work, you're just a big jerk.