Back to Campus, Where Due Process Is a Myth
The case against Dorfman boils down to his professor’s suspicion -- triggered by the wrong “exam version letter” -- that his answers on a chemistry midterm were too similar to those of Student X.
As summarized in the appellate ruling Sept. 16, the professor asked a colleague at a different school what the likelihood was of both tests coincidentally having “eight wrong matching answers,” and was told “a billion to one.”
Basically, a professor found it unlikely that two students could have eight wrong answers in common, so he accused Dorfman of cheating.
Then, in complete disregard for due process, UCSD hid the identity of someone who could possibly prove Dorfman innocent.
Why? Really -- why would a university do this?
U.S. universities have gotten away with behaving as if they aren't on U.S. soil for a long time. It's well past time that the public put their feet to the fire, and forced these power-hungry administrators to remember they aren't self-governing states.