02-19-2019 07:26:59 AM -0800
02-18-2019 09:36:51 AM -0800
02-18-2019 07:35:39 AM -0800
02-17-2019 12:39:26 PM -0800
02-17-2019 08:18:34 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Are Liberals and Progressives Sabotaging the Economy?

Bill Maher is not the only left-wing plutocrat rooting for a stock market crash and a recession, even a depression.  He's just doing it more noisily, as he always does, to attract attention. Nevertheless, there's an epidemic of this malign wish fulfillment out there, overt and covert.

Anything to get Trump, even if all of us -- well, not quite all, folks like Maher can weather just about anything-- have to suffer.

This is true even if the very people -- the minorities these self-described liberals and progressives claim they are helping -- suffer most from a (naturally) Trump-caused bubble exploding. Meanwhile, in the real world, these same minorities, black and Latino, are doing better than they have in years, possibly ever.  What a nightmare for the left.  Some are already changing their votes.

Next thing you know -- no more identity politics. Then what's left of the left?

So they pray to God for a depression, or at least a recession.  Only they don't believe in God.  So what do they do?

They sabotage the economy by jawing it down, by making it sound worse than it is.  This is a clever strategy because the condition of the economy, to a great extent,  is what you say it is or, more importantly, feel it is or can convince others that it is.  It's wide open to legerdemain. Economic success is governed almost as much by raw emotion as at is by the reality of profit and loss. What is the mood of consumers? What is the mood of big business, entrepreneurs, etc.?

We saw that dominance of emotion writ large November 2016 when Nobel Prize-winning economist Paul Krugman, in a fit of early-stage TDS, assured us on the pages of the New York Times that Trump's victory would create what would be essentially the mother of all stock market crashes. Krugman didn't stop to think through the actual possible outcomes of Trump's policies. He just wished so hard for disaster he checked his brains at the door, disregarding the obvious that markets would tend to adore deregulation and lower taxes. As we all know, the reverse happened. The market rocketed upwards.

Yet Krugman is still regarded as an important authority by a significant number of our citizens. They follow him emotionally as much as, probably more than, scientifically. They too want everything to be the way he wants it to be -- in this instance, bad.  And their emotions are easily swayed. Almost everyone's scared about their money.  If enough people say something negative is going to happen, it could.

Trump Derangement Syndrome, unchecked, could actually help create an economic downturn.  Blame will be put -- is being put -- on tax reform and deregulation, the very things that ignited the boom.  It doesn't matter that the results of this sabotage are so hurtful to millions.  The other side will have won.  They will have regained power, or some of it. They'll deal later with the remains.  First come the scare tactics.