12-10-2018 12:10:24 PM -0800
12-10-2018 11:31:54 AM -0800
12-10-2018 09:21:45 AM -0800
12-10-2018 06:32:53 AM -0800
12-09-2018 07:26:58 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Why One Dem is 'Agnostic' Toward Bipartisan Effort to Stop Taxpayer-Funded Sexual Harassment Settlements

WASHINGTON – Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-Ill.) declined to support the effort to ban taxpayer dollars from being used to settle sexual harassment claims against lawmakers on Capitol Hill, explaining she is “still agnostic” toward the issue.

“So here's the problem, in the city of Chicago, when there is misconduct by a police officer they sue the city. Why? Because you can't get much money out of a cop to settle a claim, and so what we have to look at is justice for victims. So I’m still agnostic about the idea of whether or not – there has to be consequences for the perpetrator, there's no question about it, and I think there has to be a continuum of sanctions for depending on what the crime is,” Schakowsky said after a press conference Wednesday on Capitol Hill focused on Democratic opposition to the Republican tax reform bill.

“So, I'm still agnostic on whether or not we can be sure that we give compensation that's due to a victim if we make sure – because not everyone in this Congress is rich, and it's not certain that someone who is a perpetrator of sexual harassment or worse is rich and can adequately compensate. So I understand the reluctance to use dollars that our taxpayers are contributing to pay for this, but I also worry that we will not be able to adequately compensate victims if there isn’t at least partly some of that money,” she added.

On Nov. 29, Reps. Ron DeSantis (R-Fla.), Tulsi Gabbard (D-Hawaii), Marsha Blackburn (R-Tenn.), Jim Cooper (D-Tenn.), and Kathleen Rice (D-N.Y.) introduced the Congressional Accountability and Hush Fund Elimination Act that would prevent taxpayer money from funding sexual harassment settlements as well as require “reimbursement of the treasury by members and staff who have had taxpayer-financed settlements paid on their behalf.”

Schakowsky was asked if she would support requiring lawmakers such as Rep. John Conyers (D-Mich.) and Rep. Blake Farenthold (R-Texas) to fully reimburse the government for settlements that were paid with taxpayer funds. Farenthold has said he would voluntarily reimburse the Treasury and Conyers recently announced his retirement from Congress.

“Yeah, I mean, I certainly think, you know, you can’t always get water from a rock. But, you know, I do think that there has to be some kind of accountability and that can certainly include dollars from the perpetrator,” Schakowsky replied. “But I wouldn't want that to interfere with what the individual victim gets. But, you know, asking for reimbursement and asking for compensation certainly, I think, that ought to be part of it.”

Schakowsky said she wants to see what’s in the specific bill but she has concerns with the premise of banning taxpayer funds from paying for any portion of sexual harassment settlements.