The EU's Banking Ruse to Create a United States of Europe

Demonstrators opposing Brexit wave flags outside the Houses of Parliament in London on Feb. 5, 2018. (AP Photo/Tim Ireland)

Is the EU trying to pull a "fast one" on its citizens? Maybe so.

Some recent efforts aimed at saving Europeโ€™s banks from another financial crisis may be a Trojan horse aimed at abolishing the nation states of the European Union.

Of course, the EU isn't portraying its efforts that way. Instead, eurocrats (a.k.a. European bureaucrats) are disguising their work as an effort to save the public from a repeat of the 2008-09 taxpayer-funded banking bailouts.

The problem is that the solution presented isnโ€™t necessary to prevent either financial crises or to avoid a raid on the state coffers. However, the remedy offered is perfect if you want to turn the EU into the United States of Europe, according to a leading economist.

Hereโ€™s what you need to know to understand the subterfuge.

On the face of it, the ruse of avoiding a banking crisis sounds reasonable because at least the southern countries of the EU are anything but short of dodgy banks.

โ€œThe assumptions from economists and central banks is that if we donโ€™t avoid the failure of banks, then we face systemic risk,โ€ says Ivo Pezzuto, professor of global economics, entrepreneurship and disruptive innovation at the Paris-based International School of Management. In other words, we must do something, or we face financial Armageddon.

Thatโ€™s why Europeโ€™s bean counters have been hard at work trying to figure out a solution. So, last month the European Systemic Risk Board published a report on the feasibility of creating a new financial instrument backed by a mishmash of bonds issued by the member states of the Eurozone, the single currency area inside the EU. These so-called Sovereign Bond-Backed Securities (SBBS) would be held by banks and other financial institutions to help shore up their balance sheets.

โ€œSuch an asset could help to facilitate the diversification and de-risking of banksโ€™ sovereign bond portfolios,โ€ the report states. โ€œDiversification would reduce the exposures of banks to domestic sovereign risk.โ€ That's because the securities that the banks own, such as government bonds, play a major role in determining the institution's solvency.

Put another way: a Rome-based bank wouldnโ€™t be hampered by needing to own Italian government bonds if Italyโ€™s finances took a further dive. Instead, the bank could own the SBBS assets, which are a mishmash of government bonds from the Eurozone countries. This risk spreading would โ€œmitigate the system-wide contagion that might otherwise result,โ€ the report says.

The problems with the SBBS solution are multifaceted. But the most basic issue to understand is that the regulators are like evangelical pastors in that they want to save every dodgy bank.