08-21-2018 09:27:24 AM -0700
08-20-2018 12:55:29 PM -0700
08-20-2018 11:41:37 AM -0700
08-19-2018 09:38:25 AM -0700
08-19-2018 08:31:13 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Commerce Secretary: ‘Trade Tit-for-Tat’ with China Won’t be ‘Life Threatening’ to U.S.

wilbur ross at national press club luncheon

WASHINGTON – U.S. Commerce Secretary Wilbur Ross downplayed concerns of a trade war with China but said “a trade tit-for-tat” wouldn’t mortally wound the nation.

“They [the Chinese] are rapidly ramping up their own R&D, but they're still years behind us in semiconductors and a variety of other products. Respecting our intellectual property, therefore, would slow but not stop their efforts to move their manufacturing up the intellectual value-added scale,” Ross said during an event at the National Press Club on Monday.

As an example, Ross cited the Commerce Department’s “recent enforcement actions against ZTE, China's second-largest telecom equipment manufacturer.” He said those actions “essentially caused them to cease operations,” which demonstrates “China's dependence on U.S. technology.”

“Given all of these factors, I hope that we can make a fair deal. But if it doesn't happen, a trade tit-for-tat will not be economically life-threatening to the United States,” he added.

Ross called the U.S. the “most open and the most-exploited market in the world.”

“Both China and Europe eloquently espouse free-trade rhetoric but in actual practice are far more protectionist than the United States. Our trade policy’s main objective is to make their real-world behavior match their free-trade speeches,” he said.

“China sells us far more than we sell them, and given the lopsided balance, they would run out of targets for tariffs much sooner than we would. Also, their retaliations would negatively impact their own economy as well as ours,” he added. “China buys no products from us if they have cheaper alternatives. Therefore, the tariffs they impose will come at a cost to them.”

Ross continued, “This would be particularly true in agricultural products. China has 20 percent of the world’s population but only 11 percent of the arable land. They cannot feed themselves so they must import to fill the gap, especially as their diets shift toward more protein content.”

Ross was asked to confirm if he is willing to try to get Beijing to “ease” agriculture tariffs.

“Well, we're opposed to their discriminatory sectors in all sectors, in agriculture, in non-agriculture. We're also opposed to their non-tariff barriers. They have lots of non-science-based restrictions that essentially are tailored to keep U.S. goods out of China,” he replied. “At one of the meetings where they raised the problem of the so-called mad cow problem, I pointed out to them that both the president and I eat quite a lot of American beef. And that other than the fact that we're in public office, there are no signs of mental instability as a result.”

Ross attended the Atlantic Council’s Distinguished Leadership Awards ceremony last week where former President George W. Bush, Starbucks Executive Chairman Howard Schultz, NATO Supreme Allied Commander Gen. Curtis M. Scaparrotti and musician Gloria Estefan were honored.