Oh Dear, We're Arguing
Here at home, the Left has taken over, and has imposed statism pretending to rescue the poor, while cynically empowering and enriching the political ruling class. I can't remember anything approaching the degree of corruption in today's Washington. It goes hand in hand with the incompetence and narcissism of most of our "leaders." It's a bit surprising that the corruption isn't more obvious, but that is due in large part to the reluctance of the "opposition" to open a can of worms in which they spend a lot of their own time. Peter Schweizer continues his excellent work in this field , and it's still a target-rich environment.
In my opinion, this is a large part of the explanation of the intensity of the attacks on the likes of Lee and Cruz. Our rulers, like their counterparts in big business, like huge government programs, for two understandable reasons: it makes it easier for them to eliminate their smaller, more creative competitors, and it generates payoffs and kickbacks for themselves and their allies.
There is one possible line of productive attack: use the powers of the states to experiment with different kinds of solutions. Several states have stayed out of the Obamacare fiasco. Perhaps they will work out methods for better health care programs. The current mess provides hope, and there are state leaders who seem to get it.
At the same time, we need an all-out war against corruption, from NSA to IRS to Homeland Security to HHS. And corrupt leaders, whether elected or appointed, should be driven from office.
It's a big fight, at home and abroad, and calls for civility (of the sort Jeb Bush and Karl Rove keep muttering) are entirely out of place. We need a raucous, no-holds-barred debate to clarify the tough, painful and risky policies we must embrace--and be ready to change over and over again when we discover their shortcomings--if we're going to win.
And we must win.