01-15-2019 05:09:54 PM -0800
01-15-2019 01:33:05 PM -0800
01-15-2019 11:32:38 AM -0800
01-15-2019 07:06:33 AM -0800
01-14-2019 04:41:21 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Study: Very Little Actual News Makes It to Your Facebook 'News Feed'

Close up of friends texting with cell phones at tablet

If you use Facebook you know that your feed is an assortment of posts from friends, groups and organizations, some friends of friends' posts and comments, and some random news stories, all interspersed with a growing number of ads. In spite of this assortment, an increasing number of people say they get their news from Facebook, particularly the first thing in the morning.

According to a recent Pew Research Center report, more than two-thirds of American adults get at least some of their news on social media, up from 62 percent of American adults in 2016.

The Nieman Foundation for Journalism at Harvard decided to see just how much news actually makes it onto people’s Facebook feeds. Their conclusion? Not much. The researcher, Shan Wang, described the results of her study:

 The findings were remarkable, given how large Facebook looms in news industry discussions about our disrupted present and future:

Half the people in our survey saw no news at all in the first 10 posts — even using an extremely generous definition of “news” (from celebrity gossip to sports scores to history-based explainers, across all mediums; our count included any news shared by the publishers themselves, other pages, or individuals, and sponsored publisher content).

Another 23 percent saw only one piece of news content. Sixteen percent saw two. Exactly one person out of 402 had news stories make up the majority of their feed (eight news items).

Of the 384 total news-related posts that surfaced in my sample, half were shared by someone other than the original publisher, whether by friends or a non-news page (e.g., by a friend in a Deplorables Facebook group, or by a Buffalo Bills fan page). Only 4 percent of the news posts in our sample came directly from publishers, though the range of publishers represented was pretty wide. Non-news ads and non-news posts from non-news pages made up the rest of the 4,020 total posts in our sample.

Note this again: Only four percent of our news came directly from the original source.

The results varied widely, as you’d expect. Much of what we see is supposedly determined by what we spend time reacting to with clicks and shares, as a result of Facebook's secret algorithms. In my experience, much of what I see seems random or unexplainable. Behind the scenes Facebook is supposedly figuring out what to feed us, but it’s not always clear how they decide. I often get items repeating in my feed from a few days earlier, perhaps because someone added a comment. Yet we trust them to feed us our daily news.

Wang also noted how varied the results were among those she surveyed.

Everyone’s News Feed is unique, each based on a range of signals people who use Facebook tell us about themselves, including the things to which they react, what they choose to share, their friends, and other signals. We use those signals that people on Facebook produce to deprioritize content that is inauthentic, including hoaxes and misinformation — and to prioritize things that people signal to us as more relevant to them.