10-23-2018 04:35:06 PM -0700
10-23-2018 12:28:52 PM -0700
10-23-2018 11:29:26 AM -0700
10-23-2018 08:15:43 AM -0700
10-23-2018 06:52:12 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.
X


Social Justice Carpetbaggers Exploit Government-Enforced Injustice

There was a time I didn’t know about carpetbaggers.  Being born abroad and rather innocent, the term seemed cool to me.  I pictured a hobo carrying his little bag on a stick, over the ridge.

Of course, I was completely wrong, at least in a USA context.

Carpetbaggers — as I’m sure most of you know — were northerners who went south to make a fortune off the beaten populace and the despoiled land after the Civil War.  With the former fighters of the region subdued and controlled by punitive laws, and with the wealth of the region destroyed, it was easy for any northerner johnny-come-lately to make money.

I’m not judging, nor do I attempt to judge the right and wrong of the American Civil War.  As in most civil wars, there was no right, a whole lot of wrongs, and even if the emancipation was a good result of it, it caused suffering and injustice all the way up to the present day.

Yeah, what I’m saying is “the thing could have been better handled” but certainly not by me or anyone human, because it was one of those messes humans get into and where there’s no clean solution.

No.  I just wanted to note that when the government takes sides, when the government raises some people and lowers others as a matter of being members of a group, there are going to be carpetbaggers.  There’s going to be exploitation.

In our current world, as part of a… less physical civil war, the government has stepped in, to raise some people above others by reason of historical injustice and historical redress.

Yeah, I know it was supposed to be a temporary measure, and overcome temporary prejudice, and make everyone equal and give them a fresh start.

That’s not the way things work in government.  Whatever is instituted stays around, festers, and becomes ever more complicated.

So it has been with affirmative action.  There are government set-asides for practically every category of humans under the sun, and more interestingly, the idea of affirmative action has percolated through the culture, even to those companies that aren’t involved with the government, and therefore don’t need to keep strict proportions amid their employees.

And yes, if anyone wonders, this idea of the government saying you have to have x number of this type of humans and y number of this type of humans is a very bad one.

It is bad for the companies because sometimes the best-qualified applicant isn’t the one you have to hire.  More importantly, though, it is very bad for the people thus singled out, and hired, and thus consigned to a special category.

I’ve dealt with this before on my own blog, and I won’t recapitulate the whole story here, but when I first came to the U.S. I fell in with a group of minority people who viewed everything that happened to them as a sign of discrimination.  This was easy, because, given my accent and the fact when younger I tanned darker, people treated me very strangely, including my first boss who was convinced I was both Mexican and illegal.  (No, don’t ask.  He thought Portugal was a city in Mexico.)