05-23-2018 10:30:41 AM -0700
05-18-2018 12:27:15 PM -0700
05-17-2018 08:38:50 AM -0700
05-11-2018 07:34:04 AM -0700
05-09-2018 10:17:16 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

Should Atlas Shrug Off Apple?

It's a view Apple founder Steve Jobs did not share, as reported in The Economic Times:

CEO-author Walter Isaacson, who wrote Steve Jobs' eponymous, [authorized] biography, says the iconic co-founder of Apple Inc didn't believe in throwing his money away in charity and instead thought his products would help people live better.

"(While writing Steve Jobs) I asked him about charity. He said that he would be able to do more to reform education, for example, by creating an iPad that had interactive textbooks than by being a philanthropist giving his money away.

Jobs recognized that wealth creation was life-giving. The value which Jobs created through his company dramatically improved the quality of life for hundreds of millions of people now living and billions more yet to be born. That value was not created by giving money away or throwing it down some environmental rat hole, but by seeking innovative ways to produce more at the least possible cost and provide the highest return on investment.

Cook, by contrast, has declared himself a destroyer of value. He has defied the very purpose of his position with Apple, and told its owners that they should not expect efficient production of value.

This leaves those Apple stockholders who would prefer their CEO fulfill his fiduciary responsibility with a choice. They can accept his stance in light of their minority ownership status and earn less than they otherwise could. They can sell their stock and thus shrug off Apple. Or, they can organize to bolster their ownership position and work to oust Cook from the company.

No matter Cook's fate, the fact that his value-destroying stance earned applause bodes poorly for the future of Apple. Mashable sums up the situation unwittingly:

So far [Cook's] legacy is largely comprised of incremental improvements in established products, tweaks to the supply chain, and more corporate transparency.

But Cook does care about the environment...

Care for the environment will not sustain the brand Jobs built.


Updated: see Stephen Green's dissent: Tim Cook as James Taggart?