04-26-2018 09:37:04 AM -0700
04-18-2018 10:16:00 AM -0700
04-16-2018 01:32:51 PM -0700
04-16-2018 09:59:36 AM -0700
04-12-2018 09:53:41 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.

Book Review: Fast and Furious, Barack Obama's Bloodiest Scandal and Its Shameless Cover-Up

Soon after taking power, top Obama political appointees were plotting to expand an old Bush-era gun interdiction program called “Wide Receiver.”  Breuer and others were on an October 26, 2009, conference call.  The agenda described in the book said, “given the national scope of the this issue, merely seizing firearms thought interdiction will not stop firearms trafficking to Mexico.”  The solution?  Dispense with “seizing” any firearms, and let thousands of high powered weapons walk across the border.

Some Democrats, as they reflexively do, have told the media: “Bush did the same thing, and it was called ‘Operation Wide Receiver.’”  As Pavlich describes in detail, this is false.  Wide Receiver traced, monitored, and stopped the guns before they got across the border.  When the Bush DOJ discovered some guns got across without being traced, the whole program was terminated.

The response of DOJ officials to Fast and Furious was familiar to me.  I witnessed firsthand a DOJ culture that is incapable of viewing outside criticism as anything more than the uninformed complaints about matters that complainers do not understand.  Arrogant denial is the response to any scandal.

Pavlich cuts to the heart of the program’s motivation: “In the aftermath of Fast and Furious scandal, administration officials repeatedly denied that their activities were motivated by an effort to curtail Second Amendment Rights, but what they said when the initiative was launched was rather different: they implied that American gun shops were the source of the problem.”

Fast and Furious describes handwritten notes of Gary Grindler about plans to expand government power over long-gun sales.  The “guns sold by cooperating gun shops that were part of Fast and Furious” were “evidence for a demand letter supporting new gun control regulations.  Deputy Attorney General Gary Grindler’s handwritten notes from the March 2010 meeting in Phoenix suggest a similar intent.”  The Obama administration wanted to force gun dealers to provide reports about who was buying rifles across the United States, and asked Congress for legislation in 2010.

The mayhem caused by Fast and Furious was used to support the legislative request, of course without revealing DOJ was behind the mayhem.

Fast and Furious also describes the existence of a “smoking gun” DOJ memo that reveals emails from ATF head Ken Melson to the deputy attorney general complaining about political appointees not telling the truth, and  describing the people who hatched Fast and Furious.

Breuer and AAG Weich (who provided false information to Congress repeatedly) were both appointed by the president and could be impeached by the House.  That Gary Grindler still has a job as Holder’s chief of staff tells you all you need to know about the arrogance of DOJ officials regarding Fast and Furious.

On the other hand, Pavlich describes some heroes, such as ATF whistleblower John Dodson.  Dodson protested the policy privately then publicly blew the lid off.  But the book alludes to many other ATF agents afraid to come forward.  That’s too bad.  Americans yearn for courageous patriots to step up the same way many others have over the centuries.

Pavlich’s account is refreshingly free from hyperbole.  Too often some rail about crimes that occurred in the scandal without citing a single statute broken.  Fast and Furious chronicles the facts.  It doesn’t engage in reckless rhetoric.

I was contacted in late 2010 about a blockbuster story sources wanted me to break.  It involved DOJ corruption of a scale unimaginable.  I asked a few former Bush DOJ political appointees what they thought of the story that I was being spoon fed.  “Impossible,” one said.  “Crazy, couldn’t happen,” said another.  So I didn’t touch the story.  I wasn’t going to carry water for the tin-foil-hat crowd.

The story rejected as implausible was Fast and Furious.

That Bush DOJ officials dismissed entirely the possibility that the Obama DOJ would run Fast and Furious demonstrates the naiveté some have about those now in power.  Your opponents are not following the Marquess of Queensberry.  As Pavlich describes in Fast and Furious, even a murderous bloodbath does nothing more than activate the community organizing instincts of name calling and wagon circling.