PETER JACKSON’S RESTORED WWI FOOTAGE UNDERSCORES THE FLACCIDITY OF TODAY’S CULTURE: Can any culture raise ‘rough men’ ready to defend it against a ruthless enemy when it cannot even fix in the minds of its developing youth what their sex is?

In the span of 100 years, Britain has gone from producing men who were so eager to fight and die for their country that 16-year-olds lied about their age to enlist when the minimum age was 19, to teaching primary school boys that they can have periods just like girls and offering feminine hygiene products in boys’ bathrooms. This phenomenon isn’t unique to the U.K. U.S. colleges, like the University of Wisconsin, University of Minnesota, and Brown University offer menstrual products in their men’s rooms, in the name of “menstrual equity” and as a sop to a miniscule “transgender” population.

Can any culture—British, American or any other—raise “rough men” ready to defend it against a ruthless enemy when it cannot even fix in the minds of its developing youth what their sex is? What would Winston say?

I don’t think he’d be very happy with Gillette’s latest virtue signaling to the woke few (which, needless to say, is a very different group than Churchill’s “Few”) rather than the masses of men who buy their products:

UPDATE: As always, A+ trolling by Titania McGrath:

(Bumped. Found via Maggie’s Farm, which as always, is loaded with additional links for your reading pleasure.)