Archive for January, 2006

January 26, 2006

DID IRAQI WMD GO TO SYRIA? Once we invade them, I guess we’ll know.

January 26, 2006


January 26, 2006

A SCHOOL LAWSUIT over bias against boys. I expect we’ll see a lot more of those.

January 26, 2006

EUGENE VOLOKH looks at what is, and is not, McCarthyism.

January 26, 2006

JIMMY CARTER’S APPEAL TO HAMAS seems to have gotten the usual response.

January 26, 2006

HEH. Pretty much the last word on the should-InstaPundit-have-comments subject.

And if anyone actually tried to swamp me with hate-email, I didn’t notice. Message to trolls: Not only do I crap bigger than you, even my spammers crap bigger than you. No surprise, really.

January 26, 2006

KARL ROVE on the NSA intercepts, and more. Hugh Hewitt interviewed him; transcript and audio are here.

January 26, 2006

MAYBE IT “TAKES A VILLAGE TO CONFRONT WAL-MART,” but apparently it takes the population of a small city to apply for jobs there:

A year and a half after some Chicago alderman stopped Wal-Mart from opening a store on the city’s South Side, 25,000 people applied for 325 job openings in the company’s new store, located just one block west of the city’s boundary in south suburban Evergreen Park, the Chicago Sun-Times reported.

Sounds like it might be a more attractive place to work than some people realize.

UPDATE: Bill Quick wonders how many jobs the anti-WalMart folks created in January.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Reader Freeman Hunt emails:

I’ve never worked there, but I do know that it is one of very few companies where you can start at the very bottom and work your way to the top. I grew up in Bentonville, Arkansas, the home of Wal-Mart and most Wal-Mart executives. I think people would be surprised at how many of the people at the top started out working at Wal-Mart stores. One man I knew in particular was one of the VPs in the international division making a six figure salary, and he started with Wal-Mart as a cart pusher. I think “cart pusher” is probably the lowliest job you can get at Wal-Mart.

Wal-Mart is definitely a company where someone can work his way up. No wonder so many people applied for those jobs.

You know, to me Wal-Mart is a lot like George W. Bush. It’s not that I’m that big a fan in the abstract, really, it’s just that the viciousness and stupidity revealed in its enemies tends to make me view it more favorably than I otherwise would.

January 26, 2006

HOWARD KURTZ has more on China and Google.

January 26, 2006

STUART BUCK fact-checks claims that the Secret Service is being remade into a national “Gestapo.”

I’ve noted before that the Secret Service has management problems and a heavy-handed approach (see this post collecting examples) but this sort of over-the-top claim just makes the claimer look dumb, and actually serves to distract attention from the real problems.

January 26, 2006

SOME INTERESTING THOUGHTS on cyber-disinhibition, and its tendency to lead to flaming. (Via Matoko Kusanagi.) Some people are obviously more susceptible to this phenomenon than others . . . .

January 26, 2006

GADGET UPDATE: I bought this cool Olympus digital recorder with an eye toward podcast interviews. So far I’ve just tested it out recording my classes, but it’s been very good at that — I was quite surprised by the quality, both with the builtin microphone and the plug-in remote microphone that came bundled with it. I bought a stereo microphone separately, but haven’t tried it out yet.

January 26, 2006

CHINA SYNDROME is a new PJ Media blog set up to track the way foreign businesses like Google and Microsoft suck up to China.

January 26, 2006


For members of the Old Media, Davos remains stuck in a blissful time warp where they still matter and there’s no Matt Drudge or Instapundit or Daily Kos around to cause trouble.

Enjoy it, guys.

January 26, 2006

FRANCE, IRAN, AND TERRORISM: They seem to be taking a tougher line:

What is so surprising is that Mr. Chirac’s government has in the past favored an approach of conciliation or even appeasement toward Iran and the Arab nations. He was, after all, the vociferous foe of the U.S.-led war in Iraq and a hard line against Iran. That approach benefited French companies that were able to obtain lucrative contracts in competition with corporations based in the land of the great Satan. So, what happened? There are two contributing factors. The first is the civil unrest in France several months ago, which involved nightly riots and a myriad of car burnings in many areas of the country. This violence had the same kind of impact upon Mr. Chirac and the French government that September 11 had upon the United States.

In his speech, Mr. Chirac bluntly declared, “In numerous countries, radical ideas are spreading, advocating a confrontation of civilizations.” Mr. Chirac now understands the problem. The jihadists are attempting to capture town by town, areas within Western Europe. As one French government official put it, “This is more than a clash of civilizations. It is a cancer within our country that if unchecked will destroy all of France.”

With his statements, Mr. Chirac is warning Iran and the Arab countries to desist in supporting and encouraging residents of France who launched last year’s attacks and are undoubtedly planning to do far worse. His approach is to cut off terror at the source. This resembles the policy being pursued by the U.S. government, although it is hard to imagine how great the public outcry would be if President Bush threatened to use nuclear weapons.

Indeed. Read the whole thing. (Via Newsbeat1).

January 26, 2006

A HAMAS VICTORY in the Palestinian elections:

The Islamic militant group Hamas captured a large majority of seats in Palestinian legislative elections, officials in Hamas and the ruling Fatah Party said Thursday – a devastating upset that is sure to throw Mideast peacemaking into turmoil.

Palestinian Prime Minister Ahmed Qureia and his cabinet ministers submitted their resignations to Palestinian leader Mahmoud Abbas on Thursday. “This is the choice of the people. It should be respected,” Qureia said. “If it’s true (the results), then the president should ask Hamas to form a new government. For me, personally, I sent my resignation.”

Patrick Belton, who’s been there covering the race for OxBlog writes:

It’s not clear anyone wanted this, least of all Hamas, who in assuming the administration of the Palestinian national authority’s creaking and often corrupt bureaucracy single-handed in a moment when its sole lifeline of European and other international support appears threatened, may just have stumbled into the biggest molasses patch the Harakat al-Muqawamah al-Islamiyyah has ever faced. Unlike the Lib Dems of 1985, Hamas did not go to its constituencies to prepare for government. It had prepared for a coalition, or possibly pristine opposition, but not this.

Read the whole thing, and here’s a blog-roundup from PJ Media.

UPDATE: Ed Morrissey is depressed about the results.

January 25, 2006


UPDATE: Ian Schwartz has video.

January 25, 2006


January 25, 2006

SLATE rounds up a lot of blog posts on Google’s China capitulation.

January 25, 2006

JEFF GOLDSTEIN has an idea on how to cut pork.

January 25, 2006

norahcover.jpgSo we interviewed Norah Vincent, author of Self Made Man: One Woman’s Journey into Manhood and Back. Helen does most of the talking on this one, as Vincent talks about dating women as a man, the importance of fathers, and why being a man isn’t nearly as easy as most women think.

You can listen to the show (no iPod required!) by clicking here, or via iTunes.

We thought it was really interesting, and we hope that you will, too.

Music: Strange and Beautiful (intro) and The Crush (end) by Audra and the Antidote.

And as always, the lovely and talented producer of this show is soliciting comments.

January 25, 2006

WELL, this certainly fits.

January 25, 2006


January 25, 2006

I DON’T THINK I MAKE A VERY GOOD ANA MARIE COX, but I’m guestblogging over at Wonkette today.

January 25, 2006

CINDY SHEEHAN says that Clinton killed more Iraqis than Bush. I wonder how widely reported this will be.

January 25, 2006

I’M DOING a live online chat over at the Washington Post site starting in just a minute. You can submit questions now.

UPDATE: Not everyone approved.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Reuters proves my point about comments and the press very nicely, with a quote from LGF. Thanks, Reuters!

(Said AP earlier. Fixed.)

January 25, 2006

OVER AT SPACE LAW PROBE, Jesse Londin posts the first blog review of An Army of Davids.

January 25, 2006

SCIENCE FICTION UPDATE: Just got the paperback reissue of Vernor Vinge’s first novel, Tatja Grimm’s World. Amazon reviews are mixed — it is a first novel — but what the hell, it’s Vinge.

January 25, 2006


George Galloway faces the prospect of a criminal investigation into his activities by the serious fraud office, which has collected evidence relating to the oil-for-food corruption scandal in Iraq.
A four-strong SFO team returned from Washington with what a source close to US investigators calls “thousands of documents” about the scandal. The team is expected to produce, within the next four weeks, a report for the SFO director, Robert Wardle, as to whether a full criminal investigation should be mounted into UK individuals and companies involved, including Mr Galloway.

Ed Morrissey has more on this. And then there’s this damning evidence. Of, er, something . . . .

January 25, 2006

AUSTIN BAY takes a look at the Palestinian elections. “This is a slow civil war, but at the moment a slow civil war with the chance to change into something far less violent.”

Meanwhile, Patrick Belton is on the scene and posting reports at OxBlog. Just keep scrolling.

January 25, 2006

JIM BENNETT offers advice for new Canadian Prime Minister Stephen Harper:

His legislative agenda probably needs to focus on government process — transparency primarily, to decouple the Liberals’ cash machine, and secondly disintermediation, to finish the end run around the CBC and the press oligopoly. The Bloc Quebecois and to some extent the New Democratic Party can get behind that agenda, even if as leftists they cannot support much of the Conservative substance.

But aside from that, the Prime Minister’s office is a pretty good bully pulpit, and he would be smart to use it to start deconstructing the Trudeavean deconstruction of the old Canada. He should make sure the Canadian troops in Afghanistan are decorated in a visible and public ceremony, exactly what has been denied to them to date. He should make a show of honoring the Canadian WWII veterans conspicuously and repeatedly, and having a substantial ceremony on every one of the big Canadian military anniversaries: Vimy, Dieppe, D-Day, etc. He might bring back the Red Ensign in a historical context — ordering it flown as a “veteran’s memorial flag” on select days like D-Day, and for Canadian ships to fly the Blue Ensign on a suitable day as well, maybe November 11th. It would be very hard for people to criticize him for remembering the veterans more conspicuously. And perhaps he might even consider a surprise visit to the forces in Afghanistan. . . .

The Liberals and the media are waiting for him to become a “clone of America” — but by taking an Anglospherist tack he can throw them off balance and turn the negative Canadian nationalism (in the form of anti-Americanism) into positive Canadian patriotism. America (and the Anglosphere) doesn’t need a lackey of America on its northern border — it needs a neighbor that has abandoned its touchy defensiveness and can take its proper place in the English-speaking community, of which it used to be a leading member.

I’m certainly no expert on Canadian politics — though I think that increased transparency has already helped matters — but I encourage interested parties to read the whole thing.

January 25, 2006

SO I SAW THE LINK AT BAINBRIDGE’S PLACE and naturally, I took the quiz. I guess it works!

I’m a Mazda RX-8!

You’re sporty, yet practical, and you have a style of your own. You like to have fun, and you like to bring friends along for the ride, but when it comes time for everyday chores, you’re willing to do your part.

Take the Which Sports Car Are You? quiz.

UPDATE: Okay, I seem to have killed their server with the picture link, so I’ve substituted one of my own. Here’s another.

January 25, 2006

AHMADINEJAD escapes bomb blasts in Iran.

January 25, 2006

ERIC S. RAYMOND has thoughts on Academia and the Internet.

January 25, 2006

ALTERNATIVE MEDIA ARE TAKING OFF — Again! My TCS Daily column is up.

January 24, 2006

GOOGLE CAPITULATES TO CENSORS: “Google announced that it is officially launching its services in China, a move that will require the Internet firm to subject itself to self-censorship.”

UPDATE: Publius has more, and points out the oddity of Google being more willing to cooperate with the Chinese than with the American government. “Perhaps they should change their motto to, ‘It’s just business.'”

ANOTHER UPDATE: Rebecca MacKinnon notes in mitigation, “Google seems to be trying to minimize its evilness in several ways.”

MORE: David Pinto: “I’ve removed Google AdSense from my website due to their agreement to censor searches in China.”

STILL MORE: Jonah Goldberg writes: “I think Google’s a great product and company, but doesn’t this just demonstrate that their principles are marketing tools more than anything else?”

January 24, 2006

CAPITALISM AND TECHNOLOGY: The conversation continues over at Cato Unbound.

January 24, 2006

FRANK WILSON: “Apparently, there are now only five stand-alone newspaper book sections in this country.”

January 24, 2006

WOMEN AND HEART ATTACKS: You can see video of the Insta-Wife talking about her experience here.

Helen has more.

January 24, 2006

IF KANYE WEST HAD BALLS, he’d pose as Mohammed, instead of Jesus. But he doesn’t. Efforts to be controversial have become so predictable. Yawn.

January 24, 2006

THE BBC’S WASHINGTON CORRESPONDENT is tired of America-bashing.

January 24, 2006

PEJMAN YOUSEFZADEH has a post-mortem on the Canadian elections, plus a suggestion for Daniel Drezner.

Meanwhile, over at, I suggest that the Canadian elections ought to serve as a warning to the GOP.

January 24, 2006

I THINK IT’S PROBABLY OK to question Joel Stein’s patriotism:

I DON’T SUPPORT our troops. . . . But when you volunteer for the U.S. military, you pretty much know you’re not going to be fending off invasions from Mexico and Canada. So you’re willingly signing up to be a fighting tool of American imperialism, for better or worse. Sometimes you get lucky and get to fight ethnic genocide in Kosovo, but other times it’s Vietnam.

Actually, to some people it’s always Vietnam.

UPDATE: The Mudville Gazette notes a rather sharp contrast.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Jeff Goldstein is unimpressed. So is Major John Tammes: “‘a fighting tool of American imperialism’? Really, sir, that is so 1968.”

MORE: Hugh Hewitt interviewed Stein. Here’s a transcript.

And though Stein wrote “you’re not going to be fending off invasions from Mexico,” that may turn out not to be the case.

Meanwhile, as number two, the LAT seems to be trying harder.

STILL MORE: J.D. Johannes is glad that Stein is out of the closet: “Stein, a humor columnist whose writing I have enjoyed over the years is pointing out an uncomfortable truth for the left. If the troops support the war, want to win, want to see it through to the end, how can calling for their immediate withdrawal be supporting them? . . . The anti-war-left’s support for the troops is a charade. They know the soldiers and Marines volunteer and probably make the same calculus as Stein that the troops are guilty of crimes against conscience. But to advance their political objectives, they swallow hard and pretend to support young men and women whose objective is to kill terrorists. ‘

EVEN MORE: Laura Lee Donoho is very unhappy.

January 24, 2006

DARFUR UPDATE: Writing in the New York Review of Books, Nicholas Kristof reviews two books on Darfur — Julie Flint and Alex de Waal’s Darfur : A Short History of a Long War, and Gerard Prunier’s Darfur: The Ambiguous Genocide. Kristof writes:

Much the same has been true of the Western response to the Armenian genocide of 1915, the Cambodian genocide of the 1970s, and the Bosnian massacres of the 1990s. In each case, we have wrung our hands afterward and offered the lame excuse that it all happened too fast, or that we didn’t fully comprehend the carnage when it was still under way.

And now the same tragedy is unfolding in Darfur, but this time we don’t even have any sort of excuse. In Darfur genocide is taking place in slow motion, and there is vast documentary proof of the atrocities. Some of the evidence can be seen in the photo reproduced with this essay, which was leaked from an African Union archive containing thousands of other such photos. And now, the latest proof comes in the form of two new books that tell the sorry tale of Darfur: it’s appalling that the publishing industry manages to respond more quickly to genocide than the UN and world leaders do.

Norm Geras comments: “It’s hard not to be led to the most disheartening of conclusions about the putative legitimacy of the international system. For those of us who look towards a strengthening of transnational institutions, and of the quality and the reach of international law, whether in working for peaceful outcomes, in bringing to justice the perpetrators of crimes against humanity, or in preventing major atrocities, especially genocide, how is it possible to speak for that emergent legitimacy, or the claim to one, when the international community repeatedly just stands by as the worst crime on its books unfolds?”

How, indeed? Here are some earlier thoughts of mine on this topic.

January 24, 2006

JOHN TAMMES: Undefeated in Afghanistan, beaten in America.

January 24, 2006


January 24, 2006

porkbustersnewsm.jpgPORKBUSTERS UPDATE: The Wall Street Journal (free link) reports:

When President Bush reveals his budget request in two weeks, he likely will repeat a boast from recent speeches: “We’ve now cut the rate of growth in nonsecurity discretionary spending each year since I’ve been in office.”

But such spending — for everything from air-traffic control to education and prisons — amounts to one-sixth of a $2.5 trillion budget. And it is the only piece that isn’t ballooning.

What are mounting are the political untouchables: defense and the so-called mandatory entitlement programs of Medicare, Medicaid and Social Security. The bottom line? Total spending this year and for fiscal 2007, which starts Oct. 1, is heading in the same direction it has since the start of the Bush administration: up.

Conservatives are fuming because this is occurring when Republicans control both the White House and Congress. “The White House always says it’s [due to] defense and homeland security…but even without defense and homeland security it’s record spending,” says Brian Riedl, budget analyst at the conservative Heritage Foundation. “The brakes are off everywhere.”

Meanwhile, Howard Kurtz offers part of the explanation:

I’ve always wondered why busy lawmakers make so much time for lobbyists, at least when they’re not playing golf or being comped at Signatures, and gradually I realized: They envision themselves, a few years down the road, in the same role. After all, half the former members of Congress–half!–are now earning many times their Hill salaries by trying to persuade their ex-colleagues to fund a Bridge to Nowhere or some equivalent measure.

That’s only part of the problem, but it’s a significant part.

January 24, 2006

JOSHUA SHARF has a review of Joel Miller’s new book, Size Matters. Excerpt: “The book is more likely to appeal to conservatives and libertarians looking for ammunition than to open-minded liberals. But it may also help free-marketeers-by-instinct, who’ve never given much thought to the underlying principles. By outlining the case and giving it a structure, Miller is helping to build support from the ground up.”

January 24, 2006

PATRICK BELTON: reporting from Ramallah.

January 24, 2006

APPARENTLY, BEING CRUSHED UNDER THE IRON HEEL of Chimpy McHitlerburton’s evil empire isn’t so bad:

Iraqis and Afghans are the among most optimistic people in the world when it comes to their economic future, a new survey for the BBC suggests. . . .

In Afghanistan, 70% say their own circumstances are improving, and 57% believe that the country overall is on the way up.

In Iraq, 65% believe their personal life is getting better, and 56% are upbeat about the country’s economy.

Go figure.

UPDATE: Norm Geras has more thoughts.

January 24, 2006

MARC COOPER is unhappy that Pacifica Radio is being taken over by a crazed conspiracy theorist. “So just when media is more important than ever in the political fight, just when cheap digital technology makes radio production immediately doable and accessible, Pacifica has marooned itself on the margin.”

I’m afraid the problem extends beyond Pacifica.

January 23, 2006


Conservative Leader Stephen Harper will become Canada’s next prime minister, as Canadians have elected a Tory minority government and ended a 12-year reign of Liberal rule.

Nationwide, the Tories are currently leading or elected in 121 ridings, the Liberals in 101, the Bloc in 50 and 28 for the NDP.

The Tories appeared to make significant gains in Ontario and Quebec, leading or elected in at least two dozen seats in Central Canada.

The NDP also made major gains, leading or elected in 30 ridings, up 11 from the 2004 vote.

In Quebec, where they were shut out in 2004, the Tories made major inroads, leading or elected in 10 ridings, eight from the Bloc and two from the Liberals.

In vote-rich Ontario, the Liberals, who captured 75 seats in 2004, are leading or elected in 57 ridings. But the Tories increased their support and are leading or elected in 38 ridings, a gain of 14. The NDP is leading in 11 ridings, up four.

Interestingly, Portugal saw a Socialist defeat yesterday.

And Capt. Ed Morrissey — who can claim a major role in this development with his breaking of the publication ban on the Gomery investigation — has been liveblogging, though heavy traffic has made his site inaccessible at times: “Based on the polls done before the election, that’s a better showing than I expected for the Liberals, but there is still no doubt that tonight has been a debacle for Martin and his party.”

UPDATE: Mark Steyn has a wrapup, and David Warren has thoughts on Canada’s political situation in general. Damian Penny writes: “We’ve been waiting 12 years for this.”

And Kate McMillan is already celebrating. Meanwhile, Publius has thoughts, and Newsbeat 1 is, as always, on top of the story. There’s lots more at NealENews, too.

Steve Janke, I have to say, seems more happy than “Angry in the Great White North” tonight.

And here’s the AP story, whose first paragraph suggests that the Canadian press may not be overjoyed. Actually, most of the paragraphs give that impression.

Too bad! “The Internet has also brought a new class of people into politics — I would almost say a new generation who aren’t accustomed to the old rules.”

MORE: Over at GayPatriot, an observation that anti-Americanism may be the last resort of scoundrelous regimes, but it’s one that hasn’t been working very well lately.

And Ann Althouse writes: “I suppose I’m one of those Americans who don’t spend much time thinking about Canada. I know it’s up there, disapproving of us, like a sanctimonious older sibling. But I like the idea of this change.”

January 23, 2006

DANIEL GLOVER: “What was John Kerry thinking? . . . Kerry’s first foray into the blogosphere certainly will be memorable — but probably not in a flattering way.”

January 23, 2006

AS USUAL, Winds of Change has big roundups of war news and Iraq news.

January 23, 2006

A LOOK AT THE ROLE OF BLOGS and talk radio in the runup to the Canadian election.

January 23, 2006


How bad is the still expanding scandal in the United Nations’ multi-billion-dollar procurement division? Based on a still-secret internal investigation, the answer is: for the U.N., it is just as bad as the gigantic Oil-for-Food debacle — or maybe worse.

The focus of the current scandal is U.N. peacekeeping, a function that consumes 85 percent of the U.N.’s procurement budget — a cost that could reach $2 billion in 2005. Like many of the U.N.’s financial dealings, it is shrouded in secrecy. And like the multi-billion-dollar Oil-for-Food scandal, it is wrapped in what the U.N.’s own investigators now call “systematic abuse,” “a pattern of corrupt practices,” and “a culture of impunity.”

Read the whole thing.

January 23, 2006

IF THIS PICTURE doesn’t finish off George Galloway’s career, I don’t know what will.

January 23, 2006

MATT WELCH IS MOVING TO THE L.A. TIMES: Congratulations, Matt! And I guess this means an LAT turnaround is now imminent.

January 23, 2006

porkbustersnewsm.jpgPORKBUSTERS UPDATE: John Fund writes:

In the wake of the Jack Abramoff scandal, It seems everyone has discovered the excesses of pork-barrel spending. Voters may now be disgusted enough to make the political costs to a member seeking pork greater than the benefits.

Read the whole thing. I think he’s right. It’s usually only small sub-constituencies who care about pork. Oldstyle pork-barreling depends on them knowing, and being grateful, while others are oblivious. Sufficient transparency will put an end to that. We’re on the way, but we’re not there yet.

UPDATE: According to his office, Sen. Coburn is going after pork in a big way: “Coburn intends to offer an amendment on every pork project stuffed into appropriations bills this year. There were at least 13,998 earmarked projects contained in last year’s appropriations bills. By way of comparison, the Senate had only 366 roll call votes last year. Needless to say we are beefing up our appropriations staff for this challenge and we have requested that we be given at least 72 hours to review appropriations bills before they are considered.”

January 23, 2006

LEGAL AFFAIRS is ceasing publication. That’s too bad. They may continue as a Web publication, which makes sense to me. Given their audience and subject matter, I’ve never really understood why they leaned so heavily into the print model.

January 23, 2006

REDSTATE declares a free-speech victory. More from Rick Hasen and Ann Althouse.

January 23, 2006

WONDERFALLS UPDATE: I ordered Wonderfalls a while back, but was too busy to sit down and watch it until last night. I was spurred to get it out by this email from reader Jeff Roche:

Just wanted to thank you for your Wonderfalls suggestion on your Blog Instapundit.

I was looking for an extra gift for my Wife for XMas and bought it for the her.

We put off watching it till last night thinking how good can it be. We sat there and watched 4 episodes in a row, laughing the whole time. What a wonderful show. I can’t believe it only aired 4 times before cancellation.

We couldn’t figure out how such a great show could have been cancelled so quickly. Then we read it aired on Fox.

That explains everything. The Network that cancelled “Briscoe County JR”, “Space Above and Beyond”, “Firefly”, etc.

I watched two episodes. The first one put me off a bit — I felt kind of sorry for the heroine, whose troubles are manifold at the kickoff — but I really enjoyed the second, which seemed to hit its stride. I look forward to watching more.

Thanks to Tim Minear, who made the initial recommendation!

January 23, 2006

MORE ON IRAN, and what to do.

UPDATE: Sorry, that link was open when I posted it, but the Weekly Standard folks seem to have closed it down now; I guess it wasn’t meant to be publicly available yet. My apologies to all concerned.

January 23, 2006

AUSTIN BAY has thoughts on the Canadian elections, and the Canadian military.

January 23, 2006

CARNIVAL-O-RAMA: The Carnival of the Capitalists and the Blawg Review are up. Also the Tangled Bank, the Carnival of Cars, and Haveil Havalim. Want more carnivals? They’re all right here, at

And, with today’s elections in Canada, you’ll want to check out the Canadian Red Ensign Standard carnival.

UPDATE: Plus, the Carnival of the Cats!

January 23, 2006

HOWARD KURTZ offers some advance notice for An Army of Davids.

He also mentions Kos’s new book (coauthored with Jerome Armstrong) and this passage sounds like something I could agree with:

Daily Kos founder Markos Moulitsas, who speaks regularly with Democratic leaders, will soon publish “Crashing the Gate,” his indictment of “a progressive movement that is failing to keep up with the times,” including “issue groups that don’t realize it’s no longer 1975 or even 1995” and “an incestuous relationship between the party committees and consultants that serve themselves more than our candidates.”

I don’t think I’d like a Democratic party remade in Kos’s image, but admitting you have a problem is the first step to dealing with it. And here’s more evidence that reality can transcend partisanship at times:

I just finished reading the type script of Glenn Reynolds’ “An Army of Davids: How Markets & Technology Empower Ordinary People to Beat Big Media, Big Government, and Other Goliaths.” We’re supposed to be on opposite sides of the political spectrum, but I agreed with so much in the book, especially about the power that blogging and the new technology have given to the individual to take on big media, big government and the status quo.


January 23, 2006

BRAD RUBENSTEIN is blogging from Digital Life Day in Munich. Excerpt:

One of my favorite pull quotes – Gabe McIntyre, of “Blogs are OK, but there is so much text, and I hate to read…” He then launched his promo-reel of video blogs. I suspect a quarter of the audience had their cell phones out, taking pictures which will probably appear on flickr before you know it. Preaching (almost literally) to the converted. . . .

I’m struck by the large number of projects going on in areas I am interested in, which I feel like I’m falling upon just by chance. Almost every web site that people are talking to me about is new to me. It’s not just information overload in general, even in the narrow niche where I want to know what’s going on, it’s too much to keep track of. The internet is too big, that’s the problem.


January 23, 2006


First lady Laura Bush and a growing number of physicians, educators and psychologists say Americans need to wake up and see that boys lag far behind girls in school, and then demand that something be done.

Mrs. Bush, mother of two grown daughters, speaks at conferences and in interviews about the declining status of boys in today’s learning environment. She has charged that boys are being overlooked.

“I think we need to pay more attention to boys. I think we’ve paid a lot of attention to girls for the last 30 years … but we have actually neglected boys,” Mrs. Bush told Parade magazine early last year.

William Pollack, a psychologist at Harvard Medical School, agrees.

(Via PoliPundit). Related thoughts on higher education, here.

UPDATE: Are boys just “defective girls?”

January 23, 2006

IF YOU WERE OFF, you know, having a life or something over the weekend, you may have missed our podcast interview with Austin Bay and Jim Dunnigan regarding Iranian nukes and related matters. And note the “Podcasts” tab in the Nav bar at the top, which will take you to a podcast archive.

And reader Stephen Lalley writes with something that’s news to me: “I have TiVo and they just started a new feature where you can listen to Podcasts. I input your RSS feed and there was the list of casts. Pretty cool!” Sure enough, he’s right. Cool, indeed.

January 23, 2006

I’M NOT GOING TO CALL the Canadian elections until they’re over, but Michelle Malkin has a roundup.

January 22, 2006


January 22, 2006


January 22, 2006

LOADS OF INFORMATION on the GOP Majority Leader candidates, including audio and transcripts of the blogger conference calls, Hugh Hewitt interviews, etc., at N.Z. Bear’s roundup page.

January 22, 2006

MIGUEL OCTAVIO reports a big anti-Chavez march in Caracas. Photos here.

January 22, 2006

IRAQI INSURGENTS declare war on Al Qaeda. May both sides fight to the last man . . . .

January 22, 2006

STEPHEN BAINBRIDGE HAS MORE THOUGHTS on UCLA’s angry alumni and the question of academic diversity.

Read this, too.

January 22, 2006

GOOD NEWS THAT I HOPE IS TRUE: Roger Stern has an article in the Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences arguing that oil is, in fact, plentiful, and that supply issues are politically driven. PDF version is available here.

Okay, it’s only sort of good news, as you’ll see if you read the whole thing.

UPDATE: Reader Daniel Reinhold sends this link to a paper on oil supplies.

ANOTHER UPDATE: More from Roger Simon.

January 22, 2006

IRAQ THE MODEL has more on political events in Iraq.

Austin Bay’s short take: “Al Qaeda definitely lost the election.”

January 22, 2006

ED MORRISSEY IS PODCASTING now, too. He’s got a lengthy interview with J.D. Hayworth up. Topics include immigration, lobbying reform, Abramoff, and more.

UPDATE: John Tabin and Dave Weigel are podcasting, too.

January 22, 2006

I’LL BE ON “RELIABLE SOURCES” ON CNN at about 10:30 (Eastern) today, talking about Abramoff, Murtha, etc.

UPDATE: Ian Schwartz has the video. Most striking to me is the bit at the end, where Jill Zuckman of the Chicago Tribune says that Murtha’s war record is a fair story, but one that should have been reported by a legitimate news organization, not Cybercast News Service, which she calls a “right wing part of the blogosphere.” I’m guessing if the Chicago Tribune had been on the story first, CNS would have foregone its own investigation . . . .

January 22, 2006

VIDEOGAMES: Defending the American way of life!

American troops appear to have a considerable advantage because most of them grew up playing video games and using PCs. More and more military equipment uses computers, or are basically electronic gadgets. American troops require a lot less time to learn how to use this stuff, and tend to be very good with it. This extends from fire control systems in armored vehicles, to new radios, electronic rifle sights and training systems (which are very similar to those video games.) Many other countries have to spend a lot more time training their troops to use this stuff, and the proficiency of the troops is never particularly good. This effect is often seen when this high tech American equipment is provided to foreign troops who didn’t have such an electronic childhood.

Another big American advantage here is that U.S. troops can quickly get into the computerized training systems and further enhance their combat skills. A major problem with computerized simulators and wargames is the time it takes to learn to use them. But most American troops see this stuff as just another computer game, and get right into it.

Heh. Indeed.

January 21, 2006

“A FEW STUKAS short of a squadron.” Once I read that, I was laughing too hard to focus on the article.

January 21, 2006

YOU CAN’T MAKE THIS STUFF UP: “Sen. Patty Murray said Friday that returning contributions from Indian tribes represented by Jack Abramoff would ‘taint’ the tribes.”

I am filled with admiration for her nobility in preserving their untainted status.

January 21, 2006

RANDY NEAL, the blogger formerly known as South Knox Bubba, is back with a new group blog called KnoxViews.

January 21, 2006

TEJU COLE is blogging from Lagos.

Meanwhile, here’s some unfortunate information from elsewhere in Nigeria:

More troops were sent to the Niger Delta, to aid in the search for the hostages taken from an oil platform. Secret negotiations were said to be underway with the kidnappers, but the government is also committed to crushing the gangs, which have prospered for years from stealing oil. The gangs have gotten political because the tribes in the Delta have gotten lots of pollution and no money from all the oil fields, and people are unhappy about this. The corruption that permeates the government, and much of Nigerian society, makes negotiation futile and armed violence more attractive.

Corruption and bad government — a recipe for disaster. And, God knows, Nigeria has both in copious quantities. On the other hand, if you put this together with trouble in Iran, and Hugo Chavez in Venezuela, it almost looks as if somebody is trying to put a lot of oil sources under pressure simultaneously.

UPDATE: A troubling email from James Egan:

Perhaps the hostage taking and the threats on oil production in Nigeria is motivated by pollution, corruption or poverty or… Maybe… it’s more complicated than that.

Nigeria has the largest Muslim population in Africa after Egypt — about 50% of the country. 12 states have already implemented shari’ah and there’s pressure on others to do the same. (Link)

While most of the Muslims live in the north, the dude leading up the insurrection in the delta region (where the oil is), from the Ijaw tribe, is a Muslim. In fact, he is a great admirer of bin Laden, so much so he’s named one of his kids Osma in the terrorist’s honor. Saying “…in admiration of the courage of Osama I named my child Osama. But that is my own personal belief. I admire Osama.” (Link)

Nice t-shirts too. (Link)

Reports claim that the American hostage is not doing well and the rebel group is threatening to kill all 4 hostages if he dies. (surprising that the main stream media isn’t reporting this story). Despite their leaders’ claim that they reject killing of innocents.

This is an ever more important region and our military has it on radar but recent events there, along with the antics in Iran and the recent bin Laden tapes makes me wonder what’s grand scheme is under foot (Link).

It is said that the brilliance in Reagan’s B team was that it identified the Soviet economy as their weak spot thereby enabling us to defeat them without firing a shot. Perhaps the Islamists have been good students. Maybe they see a kink in our armor and are in the final days of preparing to pry it open.

If the Iranians can get the dollar to collapse by tying their oil sales to the Euro (Link) as is planned for March, if bin laden can successfully attack us at home again as he threatened, if oil climbs above $100 a barrel and if the Mid-East become a tinderbox, could we manage better than the Soviets did in the 80’s?

Certainly the Muslim world is aware of the opportunity.

What did the recent bin Laden tape state, “diamonds cut diamonds”. Boy that has a strange and eerie ring to it.

Maybe we need take a wider view of recent events? I’m just saying, that’s all.

I doubt that such a plan would succeed, but that’s not the same as saying that there’s no such plan. I don’t know enough to say, but I hope that someone’s paying attention.

January 21, 2006

IN THE WORDS OF WILFORD BRIMLEY: “Wonderful thing, a subpoenee.”

January 21, 2006

AUSTIN BAY offers the good news and the bad news about the Iraqi elections.

January 21, 2006

NORAH VINCENT’S SELF MADE MAN gets a very positive review in The New York Times book review today. Excerpt:

That bowling league, for example. Norah-as-Ned commits to it for eight months, becoming the weak link on a four-man team of working-class white men. (Vincent has changed the names of the characters and obscured the locations to protect the identities of her subjects.) The resultant chapter is as tender and unpatronizing a portrait of America’s “white trash” underclass as I’ve ever read. “They took people at face value,” writes Vincent of Ned’s teammates, a plumber, an appliance repairman and a construction worker. “If you did your job or held up your end, and treated them with the passing respect they accorded you, you were all right.” Neither dumb lugs nor proletarian saints, Ned’s bowling buddies are wont to make homophobic cracks and pay an occasional visit to a strip club, but they surprise Vincent with their lack of rage and racism, their unflagging efforts to improve Ned’s atrocious bowling technique and “the absolute reverence with which they spoke about their wives,” one of whom is wasting away from cancer.

Read the whole thing. I told you it was going to be big!

UPDATE: In short order, numerous readers sent variations on this comment, from reader Byron Matthews:

“a plumber, an appliance repairman and a construction worker”

Since when do those occupations describe the “white-trash underclass”?

That could only get by a NYT editor, I’m afraid.

To be fair to the Times Book Review, it’s in quotes (indicating that it’s what the writer thinks others might think) — and the passage explodes a view that is, I suspect, overrepresented among NYT readers. That’s a good thing.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Here’s more on the term “white trash,” from Ed Driscoll.

MORE: Read this insightful observation from Shannon Love, too.

January 20, 2006

baydunnigan.jpgIt’s another podcast — this one featuring blogger and author Austin Bay and StrategyPage publisher, and author of many books, Jim Dunnigan.

Jim and Austin talk about Iran’s nuclear weapons program, unconventional delivery systems, the prospects for an Iranian popular revolt, and much, much more.

You can listen to the podcast (no iPod needed!) by clicking right here, or you can get it via iTunes or the RSS feed at the right. (It also appears automatically in some aggregators, like MyYahoo). As always, the lovely and talented InstaWife is soliciting comments about the show.

Hope you like it!

UPDATE: A somewhat encouraging analysis of Iran’s situation.

And note the “Podcasts” tab on the Nav bar at the top, which takes you to an archive of podcasts.

January 20, 2006

A PLEA-BARGAIN in the Milwaukee election tire-slashing case. Area blogger Sean Hackbarth has a roundup.

January 20, 2006

FIGHTING TERROR at the Jawa Report. Well, every little bit helps!

January 20, 2006

TOM MAGUIRE has licked his TypePad problems, and is on a roll. Just keep scrolling.

January 20, 2006

I’LL BE ON HUGH HEWITT’S SHOW in just a minute, talking about the Washington Post blog-comment controversy mentioned below. You can listen live online here.

UPDATE: My transcript isn’t up yet, but here’s the transcript of Jim Brady of the Post talking about the subject.

And I agree with this observation: “This is yet another argument for slashdot-style moderation. Why hasn’t it caught on elsewhere?” I read Slashdot at +3 most of the time, which filters out nearly all the trolls, and many of the idiots.

ANOTHER UPDATE: TigerHawk offers some thoughts from the perspective of a corporate general counsel: “Speaking as somebody who has been in charge of the law department at one public company or another for more than ten years, I don’t think that thin skin or ‘family values’ or any other lame-ass consideration drove the WaPo out of the comments game. Nope. I believe that the decision was probably driven by its law department out of fear that it had created a ‘hostile environment’ for its employees by permitting the unmediated publication of comments about them. Think about it — what other business does that? None.”

January 20, 2006

STAY TUNED FOR ANOTHER PODCAST, this one featuring Jim Dunnigan and Austin Bay talking about Iranian nukes. It’ll be up later tonight.

January 20, 2006

JARON LANIER has replied to comments by me, David Gelernter, Eric S. Raymond, and John Perry Barlow.

January 20, 2006

THE WASHINGTON POST has pulled down comments in response to “personal attacks, the use of profanity and hate speech.” Some people are unsurprised, while other enterprising folks have dug up the comments after deletion, thanks to Yahoo’s cache.

It’s hard for me to get very exercised about this. Given the Post’s addition of technorati links to many of their stories, they’re in a better position than most to say “the blogosphere is our comment section.” And, you know, it is.

UPDATE: Related post from Jay Rosen.

ANOTHER UPDATE: Mister Snitch asks: “At what point did we become obliged to put up with obnoxious houseguests? Why would anyone care whether some ass thinks they are “engaging in censorship” because someone’s attempt to derail a train of thought was moved off a blog? If the argument’s good, the commenter can start his/her own blog for free, and do the work needed to get the word out. If the argument stinks, why is it smelling up our blog? Don’t our other readers have ofalctory rights?”

January 20, 2006


UPDATE: Jonathan Gewirtz offers a more positive view via StratFor. I hope it’s right, though I’m not a big StratFor fan in general.

January 20, 2006

BRENDAN LOY says the White House and the New York Times are both wrong when it comes to Executive powers.

January 20, 2006

BLOG-O-RAMA: The National Journal has a lot of blog coverage in its new issue, and Daniel Glover has reproduced it on his blog. Click here for the main story (which notes that PorkBusters had a dramatic influence on the Republican Conference), and here’s a sidebar on members who blog. Also, here’s his interview with me, and here’s one with Andy Roth. He’s also got interviews with Arianna Huffington and Henry Copeland posted.

January 20, 2006

PUBLIUS says Code Pink has been photoshopping pro-liberation protesters into antiwar protests. I guess they’re taking lessons from Hugo Chavez.