02-22-2019 04:41:18 PM -0800
02-21-2019 02:04:47 PM -0800
02-21-2019 11:01:19 AM -0800
02-20-2019 06:05:04 PM -0800
02-20-2019 04:41:47 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Stretch, grab a late afternoon cup of caffeine and get caught up on the most important news of the day with our Coffee Break newsletter. These are the stories that will fill you in on the world that's spinning outside of your office window - at the moment that you get a chance to take a breath.
Sign up now to save time and stay informed!

Freedom for Tommy Robinson

Ever since Tommy Robinson was summarily arrested, tried, convicted, and imprisoned on May 25 – for the supposed offense of having live-streamed a Facebook report from outside a courthouse in Leeds where members of a Muslim rape gang were on trial – the British left and its allies abroad have been arguing that justice was done. And it's not just the left that has defended this sham. As I noted on June 5, three of Britain's most prominent conservative critics of Islam joined in the pile-on: columnist James Delingpole, UKIP founder Nigel Farage (who pronounced that “the judge had almost no choice but to give him a jail sentence”), and Tory MEP Daniel Hannan (who affirmed that “Tommy Robinson belongs in prison”).

In my June 5 piece, I failed to notice a fourth conservative who cheered Robinson's imprisonment. In a May 30 blog entry, Londonistan author Melanie Phillips declared that not just Robinson's supporters “but a number of well-known commentators and other public figures in America, Britain and elsewhere now look very silly as a result of their unfamiliarity with English legal procedure....Unfortunately, the rules safeguarding a fair trial in Britain are simply not understood at all in the US, where such restrictions on what can be said during criminal proceedings are totally unknown and the right to free speech under the First Amendment carries all before it.”

Phillips wasn't finished with the topic. On July 17, she took to the pages of the London Times with an ardent piece defending Tommy's quick-as-a-blink transformation from free man to convict. “It’s said that the length of his sentence was wholly disproportionate,” she wrote. “Given the seriousness of his repeated offence, it was in fact wholly unremarkable.” Again, she singled out Americans: “People in the US and elsewhere simply refuse to acknowledge that Britain has stringent rules prohibiting things being said or done which may prejudice a fair trial. They dismiss this as irrelevant and evidence of British absurdity. They say they know that injustice has been done here. Their ignorance is exceeded only by their arrogance.”

Ignorance and arrogance! Well, it will be interesting to see what Phillips and the other champions of the wisdom of the Leeds Crown Court have to say now. On Wednesday, in London, Lord Burnett, the Lord Chief Justice of England and Wales, and two other judges issued a remarkable ruling in which they totally trashed the actions of the Leeds court. Some excerpts from the official summary of the judgment: “court agrees that the judge should not have commenced the hearing of contempt proceedings that day. Once the appellant had removed the video from Facebook, there was no longer sufficient urgency to justify immediate proceedings.” Moreover, “[t]here was a muddle over the nature of the contempt being considered....There was no clarity about what the appellant was admitting or on what basis he was being sentenced.”