02-19-2019 07:26:59 AM -0800
02-18-2019 09:36:51 AM -0800
02-18-2019 07:35:39 AM -0800
02-17-2019 12:39:26 PM -0800
02-17-2019 08:18:34 AM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Report: Pope Francis Imposed Travel Restrictions on Two Influential Conservative Prelates

Cardinal Raymond Burke applauds during a press conference

Pope Francis has imposed de facto travel restrictions on two influential conservative prelates, impeding their outreach to the faithful, Vatican reporter Marco Tosatti reported earlier this month.

In stark contrast to the travel ban imposed on disgraced former Cardinal McCarrick by Pope Benedict XVI in the wake of sexual abuse allegations spanning more than a decade, the restrictions on Cardinal Burke and Bishop Athanasius Schneider were imposed for no specific reason.

Bishop Schneider is the general secretary of the Bishops’ Conference of Kazakhstan and titular bishop of Celerina, Switzerland. As a strong voice of orthodox Catholic faith, he has become a prominent and influential voice throughout the world.

In December 2017, Bishop Schneider was a signatory – along with Archbishop Tomash Peta of Astana and Archbishop Jan Pawel Lenga of Karaganda, also in Kazakhstan – of a Profession of the Immutable Truths about Sacramental Marriage, which was an attempt to clarify many questions that arose in the wake of Pope Francis’ post-synodal apostolic exhortation Amoris Laetitia.

According to Tosatti, the Vatican ordered Bishop Schneider last spring to “reduce the frequency of his foreign trips.”

"The bishop learned of this extraordinary measure restricting his freedom from the nuncio to Kazakhstan, Francis Assisi Chullikatt, in April," Tosatti reported.

According to the journalist, there was no written order or any other written directive “on the basis of which the bishop could take some legal initiative, eventually before the Congregation for Bishops or before the Apostolic Signatura, which until the advent of Pope Bergoglio, was the request by which lay priests and bishops could appeal to decisions of the authority that they considered unjust."

In other words, as Catholic reporter Chris Ferrara noted, there was just an "appearance of an order, sotto voce, without any embarrassing paper trail to document what is obviously a plan to silence one of the foremost annoyances to 'the Dictator Pope.'"

While Cardinal Burke's freedom of movement cannot technically be restricted without any defined grounds for punishment, the Vatican reportedly got around that by sending word to the American bishops "orally and through a nuncio" that he should be persona-non grata at their events.

The Vatican ordered the U.S. prelates to “not invite people like Cardinal Burke to their diocese, and, if it is not possible to prevent his coming, not to attend any event at which he is present,” Tosatti reported.

Ferrara interprets:

In other words, the Vatican “suggests” in a behind-the-scenes whisper that the Church in America shun a Prince of the Church who has committed no offense other than to annoy the current occupant of the Chair of Peter by noting such inconvenient truths as this: “His [the Pope’s] power is at the service of the doctrine of the faith. And thus the Pope does not have the power to change teaching, doctrine.”