08-13-2018 04:17:34 PM -0700
08-13-2018 07:12:35 AM -0700
08-12-2018 10:59:57 AM -0700
08-12-2018 07:18:43 AM -0700
08-10-2018 05:45:38 PM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.


Anglican Leaders Speak Up About 'Blasphemy' of Cathedral Flying Rainbow 'Pride' Flag

On Tuesday, Britain's Ely Cathedral announced that it would fly a rainbow "Pride" flag on Saturday in the interests of "inclusion." Ordained Anglican leaders in and outside the Church of England spoke out against this move as "blasphemy."

"The flying of a gay pride flag above a cathedral is more than a contradiction, it constitutes a blasphemy," Gavin Ashenden, a missionary bishop to England who rejected his ordination in the Church of England (and his position as honorary chaplain to Queen Elizabeth II) but kept his connection with the global Anglican Church, told PJ Media. He argued that the pro-LGBT Christians have twisted scripture to put words into God's mouth.

Ashenden cited Romans 1, noting that "distorted sexual identity and practice is diagnosed by St. Paul as a symptom of idolatry. He warns that the more a society turns its back on the living God, the more people experience dis-ease and disintegration. This expresses itself partially in a confusion of sexual identity and equally by an absence of continence."

"By contrast the Judaeo Christian tradition is a journey into a deeper sexual and psychological purity set within the parameters of God’s created order," the ordained Anglican leader explained.

Ashenden framed the discussion in terms of a cultural attack on Christianity. "The present cultural and ideological assault on the Church takes the form of an attack on the conceptual integrity of both marriage and the family. It particularly sets out to undermine the integrity of the church on the given-ness of the ‘binary’ categories of man and woman coming together to co-create as God’s agents."

Tragically, "Instead of resisting this assault, parts of the church have welcomed it. By ripping a piece of St Paul out context they have made him say the opposite of what he intended."

Rather than following Romans 1, Jesus' teaching on sexuality, and the clear condemnations of homosexual activity in Leviticus, pro-LGBT Christians turn to Galatians 3:28, the statement that "there is neither Jew nor Greek, there is neither slave nor free, there is no male and female, for you are all one in Christ Jesus." The LGBT argument (that Christians should radically accept LGBT identities on this basis) is the exact opposite of what St. Paul intended by the passage, Ashenden argued.

"Paul explored the basic categories of mutual antagonisms embedded in his culture," the Anglican explained. "Jews against gentiles, men against women and the free against the enslaved. Once anyone defined by these categories of adversity entered new life in Christ, the baptized life washed these antipathies away into a new identity."

"No Christian can be truly Christian if they place a defining categorising adjective in front of their identity," Ashenden explained. Indeed, in Mark 8:34-38, Jesus tells His disciples that whoever would follow Him should "deny himself, take up his cross, and follow me, for whoever would save his life [soul, identity] will lose it but whoever loses his life [soul, identity] for my sake will find it."