Did the New York Times Place Crosshairs on Rand Paul's Photo?
Past performance is no guarantee of future results:
—Headline at the New York Times, December 30th, 2012.
—Headline at the New York Times, today.
And note the photo choice for the Times' story. Is that a subliminal crosshair above Rand Paul's forehead? Coming the same day that the Daily Beast (formerly Newsweek) put Sen. Paul in a red bull's eye?
Yes, of course. But considering the Times wasted 800 words in September of 2000 maniacally looking for imagined "DemoRats," in GOP video freeze-frames, and destroyed Sarah Palin in 2011 over their fever swamp elimination rhetoric fantasies for using run-of-the-mill, bipartisan-approved political targeting clip art, they should be on particularly high alert for even accidentally using similar tactics themselves.
Besides -- the ghost of Saul Alinksy and his Rules #4 and #5 requires us to point these things out. (And it's not the first time since 2011 the Gray Lady has employed eliminationist imagery against conservatives.)
Article printed from Ed Driscoll: http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll
URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2014/8/7/nyt-crosshairs-on-rand-paul