As Always, Life Imitates Mark Steyn
Mark Steyn, yesterday afternoon:
When I launched my legal offense fund for my big-picture free-speech pushback against an extremist Big Climate coterie that has bullied too many people for too long, a lot of people wrote to me and said, "I don't want your crappy books and lousy CDs, Steyn. Why don't you crowdsource this campaign? It'd be a lot easier." And the reason I didn't go to one of the big crowdsourcing sites is precisely because of what befell Mr and Mrs McAleer. Kathy Shaidle has been saying this about "the landlords of social media" for years -- and years: "We don't need another conservative website ...with a faux-ballsy name like TakeThat!"; we need versions of YouTube and Blogger and now, apparently, Kickstarter. The Internet is built by people who are smart and savvy and "think outside the box" in technological terms - and on everything else are as conformist as the dreary obsolescent hacks at the dullest Gannett monodaily. And at some point or another, on abortion or "climate change" or Islamic imperialism, they'll yank the rug out from under you to "enforce a culture of respect and consideration". That's why I'd rather go my own way. It's hard work, and it's certainly tough on my rather small staff. But it's less frustrating than being told by CrowdSourcer.com that they'd like you to tone down your remarks on Michael Mann's false claim to have been exonerated because the League of Climate Conformists is threatening to damn them as deniers.
~THE CONFORMISM OF COOL: As an example of the groupthink of the cutting edge of new media, consider an exception that proves the rule:Mozilla CEO Resists Calls to Resign Amid Furor Over Anti-Gay Marriage Donation
The "anti-gay marriage donation" was $1,000 that Brendan Eich gave to California's Proposition 8, which in November 2008 was approved by the same electorate that voted for President Obama and which banned same-sex marriage in the state - until the Supreme Court ruled that the voice of the people on this matter was "unconstitutional". A five-year-old one-grand donation to a losing cause is apparently enough to render Mr Eich unfit for office at an American technology company. Because what matters in this brave new world is that everybody think alike - or at least pretend to. Invited to eat gay crow, Mozilla's CEO is for the moment holding his own:
24 hours later, we now know how that played out: "Liberal Fascists Win Again: Firefox CEO Steps Down," as spotted by Bryan Preston at the PJ Tatler.
Ace of Spades links to the sort of Stalinesque hate speech that caused all the trouble for Eich:
[jwplayer config="pjmedia_eddriscoll" mediaid="72534"]
Moe Lane lists "Why I just dumped Firefox as a browser, and so should you. #uninstallfirefox." And I can't say I blame him at all; my first thought in response to Mozilla tossing Eich for doubleplusungood thoughtcrime was also to dump Firefox, but I've been using that browser for nearly a decade now, and several of its (now ironically named) open-source plugins make blogging and its ancillary functions easier -- or in a few cases, doable at all.
But where to go? Internet Explorer? Bill Gates can sound like a cross between Margaret Sanger and Paul Ehrlich. Google Chrome? Google is, if anything, more politically correct in the Frankfurt School sense of the phrase than either company. As Mark noted, "The Internet is built by people who are smart and savvy and 'think outside the box' in technological terms -- and on everything else are as conformist as the dreary obsolescent hacks at the dullest Gannett monodaily."
Or toughest Soviet zampolit. But hey, these days, it's the left that has the Juche; and they're not afraid to use it.
Update: "Eich Is Out. So Is Tolerance," Ryan T. Anderson writes at the Heritage Foundation's Foundry blog:
Sure, the employees of Mozilla—which makes Firefox, the popular Internet browser— have the right to protest a CEO they dislike, for whatever reason. But are they treating their fellow citizens with whom they disagree civilly? Must every political disagreement be a capital case regarding the right to stand in civil society?
When Obama “evolved” on the issue just over a year ago, he insisted that the debate about marriage was legitimate. He said there are people of goodwill on both sides.
Supporters of marriage as we’ve always understood it (a male-female union) “are not coming at it from a mean-spirited perspective,” Obama explained. “They’re coming at it because they care about families.”
And “a bunch of ‘em are friends of mine,” the president added. “… you know, people who I deeply respect.”
Yet disrespect and intolerance seem increasingly to be the norm. For the forces that have worked for 20 years to redefine marriage to include same-sex unions, a principal strategy has been cultural intimidation—bullying others by threatening the stigma of being “haters” and “bigots.”
Exit quote from an otherwise rather PC guy:
I view the Mozilla CEO's firing as a triumph for the #HasJustineLandedYet movement.
— Prof. Jeff Jarvis (@ProfJeffJarvis) April 3, 2014
The mob demands fresh scalps.