'One More Example of How Obama Is Exactly the Guy His Critics Said He Was'
As Jim Geraghty of National Review Online's Campaign Spot writes in his latest Morning Jolt email, Fast and Furious is "One More Example of How Obama Is Exactly the Guy His Critics Said He Was:"
Anyway, if you think Bush using his Constitutional authority to replace U.S. Attorneys is a giant scandal, but shrug your shoulders at the federal government sending guns to Mexico, where drug cartels use them to kill a U.S. Border Patrol agent, then you are a hopeless partisan hack who is literally willing to overlook murder to advance your political agenda.
This weekend, our Michael Walsh took to the pages of the New York Post to lay out what we know about Fast & Furious, and what we need to know. A key point:By embracing his doomed attorney general, Obama has now forfeited plausible deniability and tied Fast and Furious directly to the White House, a decision he's likely to regret -- especially since he continues to assert that nobody in the West Wing were aware of the operation. Indeed, back in March 2011, Obama claimed he'd first learned of Fast and Furious "on the news" and said that Holder knew nothing.
Yeah, right. A document dump in early December last year proved conclusively that Holder's chain-of-command subordinates knew all about it. Indeed, that knowledge now lies at the center of the contempt citation and Obama's executive privilege claim -- and of the mystery: how high does this go?
Holder got slapped with a contempt charge by the House Oversight Committee owing to his refusal to turn over a tranche of subpoenaed documents relating to the now-notorious letter of Feb. 4, 2011, in which Justice categorically denied any knowledge of, or involvement with, Fast and Furious. This despite hair-raising whistleblower stories from brave ATF agents describing their feelings of helplessness as batches of weapons were transferred from the US to Mexico right under their noses -- and being ordered not to interfere.
But that letter, by assistant attorney general Ronald Weich -- who conveniently announced his sudden retirement earlier this month -- was "withdrawn" last December. "Facts have come to light during the course of this investigation that indicate the Feb. 4 letter contains inaccuracies," wrote a Justice bigwig, wiping the egg from his face.
Obama's executive privilege declaration covers the documents that directly pertain to the aftermath of the Feb. 4 letter, as Justice internally debated -- according to Holder -- "how to respond to congressional and related media inquiries into that operation."
How to deal with potential perjury or obstruction charges is more like it.
In his latest article at PJM, Victor Davis Hanson attempts to square the circle:
To Be or Not to Be a Fat Cat?
Culturally, Obama might at least have played the Jimmy Carter populist and eschewed the elite world that had so mesmerized Bill Clinton. Instead, Obama proved a counterfeit populist and became enthralled with the high life of rich friends, celebrities, high-priced fundraisers, and family getaways to Martha’s Vineyard or Costa del Sol. He somehow has set records both in the number of meet-and-greet campaign fundraisers and the number of golf rounds played. As Obama damned the fat cats and corporate jet owners, he courted them in preparation to joining them post-officium. It simply is unsustainable for a Hawaii prep-schooled president to talk down to black audiences in a fake black patois in warning about “them,” only to put on his polo shirt, shades and golf garb to court “them” on the links.
The Great Divide
Race? We live in a world where either the president or the attorney general will too often weigh in, and clumsily and in polarizing fashion, on any high-profile white/black legal matter. By now we got the message that we are all cowards, are not nice to Mr. Holder’s “people,” are racists in wanting audits of his performance, and are the sort of enemies the president wants punished.
We live in an age of a daily dose of the provocateur Al Sharpton and the nearly daily shrill accusations of the Black Caucus. No president ever entered office with more racial goodwill and no president has so racially polarized the country. Anyone who read the racially obsessed Dreams From My Father or reviewed the race-baiting sermons of the demented Rev. Wright could have predicted the ongoing deterioration in racial relations. We live in an age in which criticism of the president is alleged racism, creating an impossible situation: the country is redeemed only if it elects Obama, and stays redeemed only if he is reelected. How strange to read columnists one week alleging racism, and on the next warning us about the Mormon Church.
You can see that at work at Time-Warner-CNN, which created The Wright-Free Zone in 2008, but now asks (link safe; goes to Newsbusters), "Time Blog: Romney Comfortably Lies About Obama Due to 'His Mormon Faith.'"
So if religion is now back on the table at Time-Warner-CNN, can we discuss the intersection of Obama's obfuscations and religious background now? (No of course not. That would be...raaaaaaacist!)
Oh, and speaking of Time-Warner-CNN, one of the on-air employees of its HBO division finally discovers that the president's Fast & Furious scandal doesn't involve Vin Diesel racing souped-up cars in a big-budget B-movie.
The predictability of it all is enough to transform someone who was once The Biggest Celebrity in the World into...the Least Interesting Man in the World:
Article printed from Ed Driscoll: https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll
URL to article: https://pjmedia.com/eddriscoll/2012/6/25/exactly-the-guy-his-critics-said-he-was