Power Line writes:
The arguments that Democrats make in opposition to any efforts to reform our voting procedures often approach perilously close to the claim that Democrats, at least, have a Constitutional right to commit fraud. That seems to be the case in Ohio, where, following a bizarre Sunday night hearing, federal Judge Susan Dlott held that it is unconstitutional to have poll watchers in that state. Judge Dlott thus substituted her opinion for that of the Ohio legislature, which has enacted statutes that provide for poll watchers.
Power Line notes that Dlott has obviously chosen sides in the election–and explains why.
Update: It looks like the Ohio Supreme Court has overruled Dlott. Very interesting turn of events.
Update: PoliPundit has more.