01-21-2019 09:04:27 PM -0800
01-21-2019 05:12:14 PM -0800
01-21-2019 10:26:58 AM -0800
01-21-2019 07:52:07 AM -0800
01-20-2019 01:01:48 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

If the Election Were about Trump's Gettysburg Policies, He Would Win in a Landslide

The third, with which I am less impressed, is his intention to brand China as a currency manipulator. I'm not sure that's the best approach, but who knows?  The fourth, however, is an extremely worthwhile proposal for the U.S. secretary of Commerce and the U.S. trade representative to take hard legal lines against the trade abuses that hurt our workers.

Five, six and seven speak for themselves:

  • FIFTH, I will lift the restrictions on the production of $50 trillion dollars’ worth of job- producing American energy reserves, including shale, oil, natural gas and clean coal.
  •   SIXTH, lift the Obama-Clinton roadblocks and allow vital energy infrastructure projects, like the Keystone Pipeline, to move forward
  •   SEVENTH, cancel billions in payments to U.N. climate change programs and use the money to fix America’s water and environmental infrastructure.

All of this is great (privately Hillary doesn't object to six, as we now know from WikiLeaks) but I particularly like seven.  Trump and his advisors are "clever boots," redirecting UN climate money (nothing has a greater potential for corruption) to fixing our own environmental infrastructure. Bravo.  (And don't have a breakdown, Jill Stein.  This is more "environmental" than anything the UN kleptocrats will ever touch.)

Trump follows this with five proposals for restoring security and the constitutional rule of law.  I'm going on for longer than I expected, but key among these are pledges on immigration and the defunding of sanctuary cities, which should please Bill O'Reilly (and many Americans, not just conservatives), and yet another reiteration of the Scalia-inspired list of judges from which he will make his Supreme Court nominations.

Considering the number of times Trump has done this -- naming his nominees in writing -- I am perplexed by the Republicans who still doubt his word on this. Their skepticism at this point strikes me as an around-the-bend version of Trump Derangement Syndrome. But we all have our neuroses, myself included.

The last part of the contract contains ten pieces of legislation Trump intends to sponsor during his first "100 days." All seem straight from the conservative playbook (you should read them), amplifying the foregoing, except for 6. Affordable Childcare and Eldercare Act that might be construed as a backdoor entitlement. Even so, Trump is well past Reagan's famous 80% minimum for agreement among Republicans. He's closer to 90-95%.

His tax program is part of this legislation.

A middle-class family with 2 children will get a 35% tax cut. The current number of brackets will be reduced from 7 to 3, and tax forms will likewise be greatly simplified. The business rate will be lowered from 35 to 15 percent...

In sum, the "Contract with the American Voter" is nothing short of spectacular under the increasingly ominous circumstances of 2016 and a worthy sequel to the "Contract with America" (perhaps Newt Gingrich had a hand). We can only hope that the American people get a chance to review it -- that it won't be overwhelmed by the media's self-serving fixation on scandal and Trump's (sigh) frustrating cooperation with them -- because if the people do, I am certain the vast majority will approve of Trump's sensible proposals and elect him president.

Substance or scandal? That is the dilemma our country faces at the end of October 2016.

Roger L. Simon is an award-winning novelist, Academy Award-nominated screenwriter and co-founder of PJ Media.  His latest book is I Know Best:  How Moral Narcissism Is Destroying Our Republic, If  It Hasn't Already.