Moderate Danger: Which House GOP Members Most Deserve a Conservative Primary Challenge? (Part One)
Were my money and resources at stake, no current House GOP member better embodies the party's leadership rot than he: his incessantly measured, strategically incoherent tacking reveals a party now guided by advisor-class tutelage, not conservatism. Additionally, his status as party-protected and groomed future speaker establishes the taking of his seat as a viable means for delivering a message to leadership.
Eric Cantor has earned his primary challenge, and I would suggest to national donors that Dave Brat is the predictably conservative challenger worthy of your interest. And with Cantor's favorables low and VA-7 possessing a conservative soul, Cantor's incumbency doesn't present the imposing challenge the party might otherwise assume of it.
The tenancies of Cantor and other "establishment" Republicans deserve sunlight. I intend to provide some here at Self-Evident over the following weeks with this "Moderate Danger" series. I expect these postings will expose the situation in a manner not generally considered during the typical "RINO" vs. conservative debate, at least in terms of winning:
Always, we argue of which strain of Republican is more palatable on Election Day. Instead, we should first be discussing and exposing -- from local sheriff races to presidential primaries -- just how many roadblocks the GOP lays down in the path of viable conservative candidates.
First, let us know which seats you think deserve attention. I'm currently focused on Cantor and Renee Ellmers, but I'd like to hear your thoughts.
Article printed from Self-Evident: http://pjmedia.com/davidsteinberg
URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/davidsteinberg/moderate-danger-which-house-gop-members-most-deserve-a-conservative-primary-challenge-part-one