Yes, the Government Is Out to Get 'Right-Wing Extremists'

The Department of Homeland Security's release of the "right-wing extremism" report should anger everyone. Janet Napolitano's faux apology to veterans glossed over the real message of this memo: to intimidate the 60 million Americans who voted against Obama.

Consider the current Department of Homeland Security's definitions of "extremists" according to this memo: those worried about the usurpation of the Constitution, illegal immigration, and the threat of gun control legislation. Consider the way these real fears are cast: "Many right-wing extremist groups perceive recent gun control legislation as a threat to their right to bear arms"; also they have the "perception that illegal immigrants were taking away American jobs" (emphases added).

This administration labels those who see such real dangers for what they are as delusional. Perhaps they see us as needing a little help from government psychiatrists?

Obama himself, far from the bipartisan spirit promised -- indeed, even the respect expected from the officeholder -- mocks opposing opinions. He did it recently by ridiculing those who listen to Rush Limbaugh and he did it during his "town hall" meeting in Arnold, Missouri, to mark his first 100 days. He cast tea party participants as those "waving tea bags around." His assertion then that he would be happy to have a "conversation" about federal spending and his warning that while "we have to tighten belts, [we] have to do it in an intelligent way" were audacious displays of disdain for Americans in light of his midnight-3:00 p.m. push-through of the "stimulus" bill. Does he think we have forgotten how much time he gave Congress to sign a bill over a thousand pages long -- and after promising five days for public review of all bills?

In light of the events of just the first 100 days, we should be worried.

Those who would be concerned about Obama's anti-America rhetoric and friendliness to world dictators, as well as appointments of advisors who believe international law should trump American law, might very well and quite logically fear "a world government that would usurp the sovereignty of the United States and its Constitution, thus infringing upon their liberty." But it's a belief that Homeland Security casts as extreme.

There is nothing in Obama's background to suggest a love for his country, from the church he attended for twenty years to his work for the subversive ACORN to his law school teaching of anti-constitutional critical race theory courses. Obama rivals the tyrants of history in his race to nationalize companies and banks. Although he asserted during his town hall meeting that he has no interest in running companies, he has forced financial institutions to accept TARP money and then refused to allow them to pay that money back. He has fired the top GM executive and forced the merger of Chrysler with a foreign car company. He told bank executives that only he stands between them and the "pitchforks" -- after Soros-supported "protesters" showed up at executives' homes days earlier. The repeated refrains by Obama and his administration that "we won" to upbraid dissenters reveal a profound divergence from the traditional notions of national service. This refrain is suited to the leader of a coup.