Why Is the Black Vote in the Democrats' Pocket?
It is here that black Americans found themselves attacked from the top and from the bottom. Forty years ago most black Americans were used to being physically and socially restrained to an extent. However, what happened to black Americans in the 60s is that their enemies found a way to accomplish what the physical barriers of slavery, the legal oppression of northern segregation, and the overt terror of Jim Crow could not.
The mental chains
At the top, President Lyndon Baines Johnson -- a Democrat whose pre-Kennedy legislative career had been that of a typical Dixiecrat -- put forth a set of programs and policies infamously known as the Great Society, actually giving a part of the public funding to those who qualified to receive it. The bottom line? Many of the programs amounted to life subsidy -- "reward" for indolence, whoredom, and irresponsibility. At the bottom, liberals, leftists, and Democrats inserted themselves wholesale into the educational processes of the black poor. That education put forth a portrait of America as a full-scale villain, which made her history unneeded -- except the parts necessary to understand the crimes perpetrated on her perennial victims. With that in mind, why would liberals, leftists, and Democrats teach their captive audience about the historical role that their political opponents played in setting and keeping them free? Between the manipulation of education and the government handouts by Democrats, the Left could even convince black Americans that it was the Republicans who had actually been black America's oppressors -- and that idea, that lie, would become far more useful to the Democrats than any Great Society program, as LBJ allegedly foresaw.
An even more serious deficiency has been nurtured by the systems dominated by leftist philosophies of education, and that deficiency leads us, finally, to the answer to our question.
Too few people put enough thinking into principles -- their nature or, of utmost importance, their foundation. As a matter of fact, what many people call principles aren't really that, but are commodities -- items to be bought and sold. And it is one's principles -- or one's commodities -- that inform the decision as to whom one should give his/her allegiance.
Example: consider the admonition to "do unto others as you would have them do unto you." Or is it "do unto others as you suspect they would do unto you"? Or "do unto others before they do unto you"? Or "do unto others as they've already done unto you and not one minute before they do"?
Like all other axioms, the Golden Rule has its origin in a way of thinking, a school of thought -- a philosophy, in this case, biblical. One forms his/her principles from a philosophy, usually one or several taught at school and/or at home. Now I can't speak for what is taught in all homes, only my own. However, I can authoritatively say that few bases for forming principles -- as opposed to commodities -- were taught at the public schools I attended in South Central Los Angeles. Barely were the particulars of our Declaration of Independence, our Constitution, and our Bill of Rights covered. Of course we had heard the phrase "unalienable rights," but what did that mean, really? And the men who formed these words, these ideas, and built a nation on top of them, where did they get these ideas about rights and government from? Did they just pop up, unbidden? Or were the men simply building on the philosophies of someone(s) else?
Who knew the answers to these questions? Not I; not then. Where I went to school, one was taught what to think, but not how and definitely not why. One was not taught how to build a foundation for one's principles or that a foundation needed to be built.
Into that vacuum jump many notions, but the one specific to the subject at hand is the idea that the party which is giving you the most things -- the one that will "do something for you" -- is the party to which you should belong. And if "principles" have no foundation, those "principles" -- and their owners -- can be purchased. And though there are a few black so-called conservative Republicans out there, all too many of them -- like Watts -- still find themselves reverting to the "do something for us" idea, a liberal Democrat ideal. No wonder some believe that our political persuasion is grounded in advantage rather than principle.
The Democratic Party has counted on this absence -- of history taught/learned and of principles adhered to -- in all of its members, but most especially has it counted on this dearth in black Americans, a dearth which has allowed too many black Americans to stick themselves to the Democratic Party like glue, or chain themselves to the party like ...
The Democrats should take pride in a job well done.
Article printed from PJ Media: http://pjmedia.com/
URL to article: http://pjmedia.com/blog/why-is-the-black-vote-in-the-democratic-pocket