10-22-2018 12:21:07 PM -0700
10-22-2018 09:32:15 AM -0700
10-22-2018 07:13:32 AM -0700
10-21-2018 04:49:40 PM -0700
10-21-2018 10:49:06 AM -0700
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

Who Says There's No Difference Between Democrats and Republicans?

According to the National Journal’s ratings, the disparity between Democratic legislators and Republican legislators in terms of average scores is equally significant in both chambers. Using the liberal score, with a higher number denoting more liberal, the average yearly score over this period for the Democrats in the Senate is 75.9 and for the Republicans its 26.7. In the House the mean score for Democrats is 75, while the Republicans have averaged a 26.4 .

A look at the NTU’s data (where a higher score now means more fiscally conservative) confirms this disparity:

Since 1995, based on their voting on matters that significantly affect taxes, spending, debt, and regulation, the NTU has given Senate Democrats an average yearly score of 16%; a score that qualifies as a “D” on the NTU’s grading scale. This score is 55 points lower than the 71% (a “B+”) that Republicans in the Senate have averaged. To put this in context, according to this data the average Republican in the Senate over this period has about as much in common with the average Democratic senator as Jon Kyl does with Susan Collins or Arlen Specter.

In the House, Democrats over this 14-year span have received an average yearly score of 21% (“F”), while their colleagues on the other side of the aisle have averaged a 63% (“B-“).

Amazingly, over this entire period only one score of “C-“ or better has been achieved by either one of these two groups of Democrats. The House Democrats were able to accomplish this with a 37% in 1996.

What is perhaps even more telling is that in only three of these years have more than two individual Democratic senators received a “C-“ or better grade. In fact, since 2003 only Zell Miller (’03 and ’04) and Ben Nelson (’03, ’05, and ’06) have accomplished this feat.

On the flip side neither group of Republicans has ever scored worse than a "C+" over this period, and outside of ’07 and ’08 there have only been two years where more than one individual Republican senator has scored worse than a "C-."

Taken in combination these two congressional ratings make it abundantly clear that when it comes to assessing blame for this country’s financial problems, Republicans and Democrats are nowhere near equally responsible. Only from an upside down Keynesian perspective (in which case you would view the NTU’s grades in reverse) would blaming Republicans make any sense.

The truth is, blaming all members of Congress for this nation’s financial problems is analogous to blaming the overall poor performance of a grade school class on the entire class, even though some of those in the class did fine.

Let’s face it. When a typical Democratic senator is someone like Harry Reid, and Democrats in the left-wing of their party -- like Barack Obama -- oppose legislation that expands the role of government about as often as Al Gore engages in an honest debate, the blame needs to be placed squarely on them.