02-15-2019 01:00:05 PM -0800
02-15-2019 09:32:56 AM -0800
02-15-2019 07:34:51 AM -0800
02-14-2019 05:19:47 PM -0800
02-14-2019 04:32:01 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

What's Eating Mitt Romney?

George Neumayr asks why's Mitt so mad, as he showed in that interview with Bret Baier this week. It's a good piece, worth a read. Neumayr works through the current polls and concludes that Romney must be frustrated that he, an upstanding man whose worst moral failings seem to end with the one cig he smoked as an unruly teen, can't break away from a field that's currently led by a trio of himself, Newt Gingrich and Herman Cain with their accused or affirmed cheating. The choirboy who studied hard and played by the rules resents the success of the slackers and rebels who didn't. He's the brother in the parable of the prodigal son.

I think that may be part of the reason Mitt's mad this week, but not all of the reason.

Roll back to 2008. I was at Hot Air and later the Laura Ingraham show back then. Romney was running as the conservative businessman who had enough crossover appeal to win in Massachusetts. He touted his success with the Olympics, his business experience, and his win (but not really his record) in Massachusetts. As the primary wore on he became the credible conservative alternative to John McCain, or at least that became his narrative. His campaign did a great deal of direct outreach to blogs and conservative talk radio in those days, making him accessible, granting interviews, really being involved. He took a hard line on immigration, he took a hard line on the war, on just about everything. I ended up endorsing him, which definitely earned him one vote in a meaningless Maryland primary, and he also won the endorsements or recommendations of Laura Ingraham, Rush Limbaugh, etc. Many of the big guns of the conservative movement backed him over McCain and Huckabee.

And he lost to the moderate, aisle-crossing and uninspiring John McCain.

Mitt Romney is a smart man. He strikes me as a pragmatic corporate tinkerer and fixer, the kind of person who can examine a given situation, diagnose what's wrong with it, and come up with a fix. He has probably spent the years between that 2008 campaign and the current one thinking and re-thinking about every move he made in that failed effort. Like an NFL coach poring over game film of the Super Bowl he lost, Romney has replayed much of the 2008 campaign in his mind, not in a weird regretful way, but so that he can figure out what went wrong and win next time. He seems to have concluded that since being the conservative candidate didn't work then, he would try being the moderate now. Hey, that's who won last time around, right?