12-14-2018 09:10:01 PM -0800
12-14-2018 11:13:25 AM -0800
12-14-2018 10:00:59 AM -0800
12-13-2018 04:11:41 PM -0800
12-13-2018 01:40:43 PM -0800
It looks like you've previously blocked notifications. If you'd like to receive them, please update your browser permissions.
Desktop Notifications are  | 
Get instant alerts on your desktop.
Turn on desktop notifications?
Remind me later.
PJ Media encourages you to read our updated PRIVACY POLICY and COOKIE POLICY.

What Rick Perry Doesn’t Know

Yes, vetoes have long been the subject of heated debate and partisan persecution. While Rick Perry is currently facing indictment, John Tyler was almost impeached by Congress after vetoing a tariff bill in 1842. In the same way Rick Perry wasn’t afraid to veto the funding for a Public Integrity Unit that was led by a woman who demonstrated everything but public integrity (in light of her arrest for DWI), John Tyler unabashedly vetoed Congress’s legislation for the Independent Treasury System not once, but twice—even though his own Whig party supported the bill. When President Tyler then vetoed Congress’s tariff bill, he turned his own party against him and, in their fury, the Whigs moved to impeach him. Rick Perry got the short end of the stick—he only got to veto the bill once before receiving his official chastisement.

Looking back through history and seeing the treatment of President John Tyler, it becomes easier to realize how quickly partisan politics can come into effect. In 1842, Congress and the Whigs had no grounds to try to impeach John Tyler—he had simply issued a veto on a piece of legislation with which he did not agree. The Whigs in Congress moved to impeach Tyler because he had abandoned his party in light of standing up for what he believed—and simply overturning the veto would have been too boring and drab.  The same goes for Governor Rick Perry. Since when was a governor not allowed to veto a piece of legislation with which he disagreed, no matter the reason? And to those who say that Perry’s situation is different because he “threatened” to veto the funding before he actually did so, as if we haven’t heard a president warn Congress that he would veto a piece of legislation even if it passed both chambers, just look back to July 30 when President Obama “threatened… to veto the House’s border-spending bill.”

Where there is government, there will be partisan politics and there will be threats as politicians vie for power to get their way. We don’t have to watch House of Cards to discover that.

In the same way Congress was unable to impeach John Tyler (the motion failed 98 to 90), Rick Perry’s indictment charges will soon fall flat. In short, Rick Perry’s indictment is nothing new—rather this may serve as a precursor to a successful 2016 bid.

Modern-day John Tyler anyone?