The Chutzpah of the National Jewish Democratic Council

He discussed anti-Semitism, without mentioning the fact that the Muslim Middle East is the primary supplier of anti-Semitic fervor in the world. He talked about the 60-plus years of Palestinian suffering, taking the Palestinian view that the very creation of Israel was bad. He discussed Gaza as an occupied territory.

Maybe the president didn't read the newspapers in August 2005, but Israel pulled out of Gaza almost four years ago.

Probably the worst part of the president's speech was that he took the Arab propaganda position of linking the Holocaust to the creation of Israel.

Stanley chalks it up to "typical Jewish paranoia," as if Jews are not allowed the same First Amendment rights as the rest of the country:

I understand that we in the Jewish community can be a bit paranoid at times, but to say that this administration does not support and communicate with one of our closest allies is to disregard reality. Obama, his pro-Israel policies and the president's pro-Israel advisers continue to receive strong support in the Jewish community. This administration has made an unprecedented effort to engage this community and has placed Middle East peace high on the agenda.

Let’s look at Obama's “outreach" to the Jewish community. Is Stanley talking about his reluctance to fill the position of special envoy to monitor and combat anti-Semitism? Giving the Medal of Honor to Mary Robinson, who presided over the anti-Semitic Durban conference? The fact that Obama does not want any Jews to move to Jerusalem, even if the land has been owned by Jews for decades?

Are the "pro-Israel" advisers Stanley is speaking about people like Hilary Clinton, who was the first person associated with any administration to call for a Palestinian state, which she did during her husband's administration? Except for her short stint as New York senator, when she needed the Jewish vote, Clinton has usually taken an anti-Israel stance.

Maybe Marc was talking about Samantha Power -- who once called on the United States to send in the Army to impose a solution on Israel.

Peace for Israel will only be fully ensured if Israel's security is maintained. Israel is negotiating with a party that is still calling for her destruction. Yet Obama is publicly blasting Israel, while leaving his buddies in the PA and Arab nations alone despite the fact that they are not playing along with his "peace" plans.

Obama has made clear that Israel is a second-class citizen compared to the Arab countries.

Most interesting was Mr. Stanley's choice of venue -- he tried to talk to American Jews through an Israeli newspaper. His piece was not meant as a message to the American Jewish community, as he could have published it in the Times or Post. No, the purpose of Marc Stanley's article was nothing more than to gain "street-cred" with the Obama administration and the Democratic Party. He did not even approach a reasonably partisan analysis.

And that is the problem -- Obama's Jewish defenders, including J Street, Americans for Peace Now, NJDC, and others, are interested not in Israel but in their personal career advantage, their funding from George Soros, or their own vision of "peace."

Despite what their vision would mean to the security of Israeli Jewish families.