Small Group of Bureaucrats Hampering Use of Anti-Terror Technology
Recent headlines shared horrible news about the intentions of those who wish to do the United States harm:
Al-Qaeda Terror Attempt on NWA Flight 253 (Dec. 25, 2009)
Seven CIA Operatives Killed by Double Agent in Afghanistan (Dec. 31, 2009)
Muslim Extremist Kills 13 at Fort Hood, Texas (Nov. 5, 2009)
These are but a few recent examples of the importance of preventative intelligence -- that is, the ability to determine enemy intentions in order to effectively interdict the specific threat posed by an enemy before it occurs, according to James Chapman, education and standards director of the National Association of Computer Voice Stress Analysts, a group that represents more than 1,800 law enforcement agencies and the thousands of criminal justice officials who use CVSA on a daily basis to solve crimes.
Unfortunately, the federal government has failed to use existing U.S. technology to identify enemy intentions -- namely those of individual terrorists and highly compartmentalized terrorist cells -- through all legal means possible. Instead, says Chapman, the 67-year-old regarded by many as the world’s foremost authority on CVSA®, they’ve sided with a tiny group of government employees determined to maintain the status quo.
“With the exception of a small minority of the population, few Americans know the U.S. possesses a technology that has been proven through research and field application to have the ability to identify terrorists and their intentions,” Chapman explained during an interview Monday.
“More than 1,800 local, municipal, state, and federal criminal justice agencies use CVSA to solve crimes and determine the suitability of individuals to perform law enforcement related duties,” he said. “Likewise, the technology is authorized under the Aviation and Transportation Security Act of 2001 for the screening of potential terrorists and to ensure the security of U.S. airports and the flying public.”
On the military front, the man with nearly four decades of experience working with voice stress analysis said few people outside of the Pentagon know Gen. David Petraeus and his advisors advocate for the use of this technology in the Army's "Counterinsurgency" Field Manual (U.S. Army FM 3-24, Dec. 2006).
“In fact, General Petraeus was responsible for producing the field manual during his exile to non-combat duty by former Secretary of Defense Donald Rumsfeld,” Chapman explained. “Sadly, its content has been kept secret from the American public.
“A small, secretive group of bureaucrats and political appointees have effectively blocked the use of the highly sophisticated Computer Voice Stress Analyzer after repeated and well-documented successes of the technology in accurately identifying foreign terrorists.” (See "If Not for Memo, Torture Might Not Be An Issue (Part 1)" and "Part 2" for details about the Defense Department's decision-making on this subject.)
What motivates those in the polygraph community?
Chapman believes they’re simply trying to preserve an entrenched bureaucratic structure that has existed for decades.
“Within the Pentagon there is a small group of bureaucrats who have not been capable of devising a technology to rival CVSA after more than 20 years and tens of millions of taxpayer dollars spent on research,” Chapman said. “Yet they have blocked the CVSA simply to ensure their power and their monopoly over government truth verification operations.”
A 19-year study of CVSA technology by Chapman, professor emeritus and former director of the Criminal Justice Program and the Forensic Crime Laboratory at the State University of New York in Corning, demonstrated conclusively that CVSA is an effective and accurate truth verification tool, with an accuracy rate above 95 percent.