Self-Defense Stands to Be Super-Sized in Florida
George Zimmerman would have been even more likely to walk away from charges in the Trayvon Martin shooting if House Bill 169 and Senate Bill 344, which are now before the Florida House and Senate criminal justice subcommittees, had been the law of the state in 2012.
Forget Zimmerman for a paragraph. Andrew Branca, an attorney specializing in self-defense law, warns the legislation, as proposed, would make it nearly impossible to prosecute anyone who claims he killed in self-defense.
HB 169 was proposed Sept. 15 by the man often referred to as the “Godfather of Stand Your Ground” in Florida, Rep. Dennis Baxley (R). Sen. Rob Bradley (R) introduced a companion piece of legislation in the Senate, SB 344, a few days later.
Although some describe the legislation as a new version of Stand Your Ground in Florida, Branca explained it really is not. HB 169 and SB 344 don’t touch the concept of whether a person who feels he is in danger has to try to run for his life.
Instead, the legislation amplifies the self-defense immunity argument or the “use or threatened use of defensive force” and puts the burden of proof on the prosecution once a prima facie claim of self-defense immunity is raised by the person who fights back against an attack or the threat of an attack.
If prosecutors fail to prove the defendant did not act in self-defense, under the legislation offered by Baxley and Bradley a judge could stop the case at the pre-trial hearing stage.
In other words, George Zimmerman’s attorneys could have claimed self-defense and then it would have been up to the prosecution to prove Zimmerman did not act in self-defense.
HB 169 and SB 344 would also shorten the timeframe given prosecutors to accumulate evidence and craft their arguments.
This makes prosecutors and civil rights advocates nervous, too: People who successfully make their case of self-defense could go after the jurisdiction that charged them with a crime for “specified costs, attorney fees & related expenses.”
Baxley argues in the text of proposed legislation that it is only intended to clarify Florida’s self-defense law and “correct misinterpretations of legislative intent made by the courts.”
Baxley and Bradley describe HB 169 and SB 344 as “minor tweaks” to existing law.